1985
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.35.12.1797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aphasia and agraphia in lesions of the posterior internal capsule and putamen

Abstract: We studied three right-handed patients with small, lacunar infarcts localized by CT to the posterior and lateral putamen and the posterior limb of the internal capsule. All had moderate or severe right hemiparesis and mild aphasia that was not characteristic of any traditional aphasia syndrome. Two had mild dysarthria. Aphasic abnormalities included mild, nonfluent, telegraphic speech and mild, fluent aphasia with impaired repetition, naming, and comprehension. All three had severely impaired writing. Unlike p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the lesion-based literature, peripheral processes have been most consistently associated with a left frontal–parietal network including, but not limited to, the dorsal premotor cortex and SPL (Exner, 1881; Ritaccio et al, 1992; Tohgi et al, 1995; Lubrano et al, 2004; Roux et al, 2009). In addition, peripheral dysgraphias have been described that are associated with damage to neural regions involved in general motor processing (not specifically in written language production) such as motor cortex, cerebellum, and various sub-cortical structures, e.g., caudate, putamen, and thalamus (Tanridag and Kirshner, 1985; Pramstaller and Marsden, 1996; Denes et al, 2005; Fournier Del Castillo et al, 2011). Finally, it is worth mentioning that spatial dysgraphias have been associated with some forms of spatial neglect (e.g., Caramazza and Hillis, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the lesion-based literature, peripheral processes have been most consistently associated with a left frontal–parietal network including, but not limited to, the dorsal premotor cortex and SPL (Exner, 1881; Ritaccio et al, 1992; Tohgi et al, 1995; Lubrano et al, 2004; Roux et al, 2009). In addition, peripheral dysgraphias have been described that are associated with damage to neural regions involved in general motor processing (not specifically in written language production) such as motor cortex, cerebellum, and various sub-cortical structures, e.g., caudate, putamen, and thalamus (Tanridag and Kirshner, 1985; Pramstaller and Marsden, 1996; Denes et al, 2005; Fournier Del Castillo et al, 2011). Finally, it is worth mentioning that spatial dysgraphias have been associated with some forms of spatial neglect (e.g., Caramazza and Hillis, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive disorders have been reported in selected cases or in short series. Indeed, left lesions could be the source of aphasia [10][11][12][13], which is most often of the transcortical motor type. Others deficits could be observed, such as constructive apraxia [12] and amnesic syndrome [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-stroke language disorders are frequent and include aphasia, alexia, agraphia and acalculia. Based on CT scan findings, aphasia with variable expressive and receptive components have been described with lesions in the dominant anterior limb of the internal capsule, the head of the caudate, and the putamen and with the lesions in the posterior limb of the dominant internal capsule (7,8). There are different definitions of aphasias, but the most widely accepted neurologic and/or neuropsychological definition is that aphasia is a loss or impairment of verbal communication, which occurs as a consequence of brain dysfunction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%