2009
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.118356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apolipoprotein B and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Position Statement from the AACC Lipoproteins and Vascular Diseases Division Working Group on Best Practices

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been the cornerstone measurement for assessing cardiovascular risk for nearly 20 years.CONTENT: Recent data demonstrate that apolipoprotein B (apo B) is a better measure of circulating LDL particle number (LDL-P) concentration and is a more reliable indicator of risk than LDL-C, and there is growing support for the idea that addition of apo B measurement to the routine lipid panel for assessing and monitoring patients at risk for cardiovascular diseas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
228
3
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 295 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
5
228
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent reviews have established the superiority of non-HDL-C and ApoB over LDL-C in predicting CVD risk in epidemiological studies [35] and in randomized trials of patients on statin treatment [40]. Non-HDL-C has been recommended by previous ATP III guidelines as a secondary target of therapy and to be used to assess risk in patients with elevated TG levels [>200 mg/dl (>2.26 mmol/l)] [1,2], with the latter confirmed by a subsequent study comparing non-HDL-C to direct and calculated LDL-C using 8 different assays [4].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent reviews have established the superiority of non-HDL-C and ApoB over LDL-C in predicting CVD risk in epidemiological studies [35] and in randomized trials of patients on statin treatment [40]. Non-HDL-C has been recommended by previous ATP III guidelines as a secondary target of therapy and to be used to assess risk in patients with elevated TG levels [>200 mg/dl (>2.26 mmol/l)] [1,2], with the latter confirmed by a subsequent study comparing non-HDL-C to direct and calculated LDL-C using 8 different assays [4].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerns also exist about the reliability of non-HDL-C measurements, as a result of problems with direct HDL-C measurements [29]. Alternatively, Apo B and its association with CVD risk have been recognized [39,40], reportedly performing better than LDL-C in hypertriglyercedaemic patients [35,41] and as an index of LDL-lowering therapy [39]. The Hattori formula for LDL-C (0.94TC -0.94HDL-C -0.19 x TG) was developed to estimate LDL-Apo B and small dense LDL from blood cholesterol, TG, HDL-C and in this way be more accurate in patients with cardiovascular co-morbidities and dyslipidemias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further trials disclosed that a lowering of plasma total cholesterol by 10 % and of LDL cholesterol by 40 mg/dl are followed by a 25 % and 20 % reduction in CHD incidence, respectively (Baigent et al , 2005 ). Therefore, currently LDL levels are the most common marker in determining cardiovascular risk and LDL particles are the most desired target of hypercholesterolemia therapy (Contoids et al , 2009 ;Sandeep and Davidson , 2011 ). Elevated LDL cholesterol levels are a result of perturbations in its metabolism (Toutouzas et al , 2010 ).…”
Section: Current Strategies For Lowering Cholesterol Level In Bloodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As TRL and LDL particles contain a single molecule of apolipoprotein B (ApoB), the concentration of ApoB in plasma provides a measure of the concentration of all potentially atherogenic lipoproteins and thus may be a better indicator of cardiovascular risk than the simple measurement of LDLcholesterol [7][8][9][10]. This may be particularly important for people with type 2 diabetes, who tend to have increased concentrations of atherogenic TRL and small LDL particles, such that the LDL-cholesterol concentration no longer reflects the particle concentration of LDL [1,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%