1996
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(96)00006-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent size-dependent growth in aggregating crystallizers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of including particle aggregation phenomenon into the prediction, a greater proportion of large size aggregates were formed, adding mass on/near the reactor boundary ( Figure 10, dotted line). This is probably related to the size dependence of the Brownian aggregation kernel, as smaller particles are more likely to collide and produce an aggregate (Ginter and Loyalka, 1996;Smoluchowski, 1917). The predicted particle mean size of the counter-current reactor is approximately 5 times larger than that of the confined jet mixer as simulated in the growth model ( Figure 10, dashed line).…”
Section: Particle Size Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In the case of including particle aggregation phenomenon into the prediction, a greater proportion of large size aggregates were formed, adding mass on/near the reactor boundary ( Figure 10, dotted line). This is probably related to the size dependence of the Brownian aggregation kernel, as smaller particles are more likely to collide and produce an aggregate (Ginter and Loyalka, 1996;Smoluchowski, 1917). The predicted particle mean size of the counter-current reactor is approximately 5 times larger than that of the confined jet mixer as simulated in the growth model ( Figure 10, dashed line).…”
Section: Particle Size Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The mean predicted particle size was about 8 nm when aggregation was considered during simulation, as shown in Figure 7b. Larger TiO 2 nanoparticles with broader particle size distributions, obtained when involving aggregation effects, were probably related to the size dependence of the Brownian aggregation kernel, as smaller particles were more likely to collide and produce large aggregates [35,39].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%