2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent wall slip velocity measurements in free surface flow of concentrated suspensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few authors such as Koh, Hookham & Leal (1994) and more recently Medhi, Kumar & Singh (2011) observed a significant slip between the particles and the carrier fluid near a solid boundary. As Koh et al (1994) themselves admitted, the relative motion of the particle and fluid phases is difficult to understand if the density mismatches are vanishingly small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few authors such as Koh, Hookham & Leal (1994) and more recently Medhi, Kumar & Singh (2011) observed a significant slip between the particles and the carrier fluid near a solid boundary. As Koh et al (1994) themselves admitted, the relative motion of the particle and fluid phases is difficult to understand if the density mismatches are vanishingly small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quantitative description of the motion of a sediment at a wall is quite difficult [71][72][73][74][75][76], and there are still many open questions. The following problems may be of relevance, but are beyond the scope of the present investigation: resuspension of particles [77,78] and related processes [79]; shear-induced migration of particles in concentrated suspensions [73][74][75]; not a sharp interface [80] and shear-induced corrugation of interfaces [81]; wall slip (depending on surface properties and particle material) [82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89]; stick-slip events [90]. For the present investigation, it is only of importance how the motion of the sediment affects the bulk flow, as this is what controls the settling time and the concentration in the suspension during the settling process.…”
Section: Iib: Sediment Moves Along the Wallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plateau visible in the shear stress behavior of especially 1.6% MFC (see also Fig 2(a)) is most likely related to existence of concentration gradient and, at higher values of flow rate, even of a thin particle depletion layer near the wall. The well-known explanation for such phenomenon is given by the combined effect of steric hindrance and repulsive hydrodynamic interaction between the tube wall and suspended particles (Barnes 1995;Medhi et al 2011;Leighton, Acrivos 1987;Jäsberg et al 2000). This interpretation is supported by Fig 7 (a) and (b) showing the measured dependence of viscosity at wall and of apparent slip velocity on wall shear stress, respectively.…”
Section: Boundary Layer Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%