Appeals to Autonomy and Obedience: Continuity and Change in Governing Technologies in Danish and Swedish Health Promotion

Abstract

The increasingly used concept new public health indicates that a fundamental change has occurred in the goals and methods of disease prevention and health promotion. The change is often said to imply less expert-driven governing of citizens. In this article, governing technologies in the field of public health in Denmark and Sweden are analysed to investigate whether substantial changes have taken place in the governing efforts. In the endeavours unfolded in relation to health examinations for children and pregnant women during the last eighty years, no apparent evidence exists of a significant change in governing technologies. Regulatory, expert-driven and empowering technologies have been used during the whole period; additionally, appeals to autonomy, responsibility and obedience as well as to trust in authorities co-exist throughout the period. The fundamental change is the huge increase in the health authorities' governing ambitions.

A stitch in time saves nine: Perceptions about colorectal cancer screening after a non-cancer colonoscopy result. Qualitative study

“…Denmark is renowned for a high level of institutional trust in healthcare services (51)(52)(53), and this might play a pivotal role in the high participation rate in Danish CRC screening compared with other high-income countries (43,54). However, trust in health authority recommendation may not e de isi e fo people s ishes o choices regarding screening in all cases.…”

Manipulating practices: A critical physiotherapy reader

“…The "rationalities" and "technologies" of such government (Lemke, 2002) now extend far beyond the traditional confines of the "clinic", and instead pervade any number of diverse domains and discourses. The intent of this new public health is described as a paradigm shift from reducing disease, to improving health, via increasing reliance on empowered, autonomous and self-disciplining individuals rather than expert dominance (Vallgarda, 2011).…”

Kritiske perspektiver i helsefagene: Utdanning, yrkespraksis og forskning

“…Analysene har derfor hatt et saerlig blikk på aspekter som rommer maktteknologienes tosidighet, og involverer for eksempel disiplin og selvdisiplin, kontroll og selvkontroll, hjelp og selvhjelp i behandlingsprogrammets kurs i livsstilsendring og knyttet til kirurgisk overvektsbehandling (Vallgårda, 2011).…”