2006
DOI: 10.13031/2013.20177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apple Shape and Rolling Orientation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, numerous model parameter sets yield the same length and diameter but result in vastly different shapes. Whitelock et al (2006) developed a more restrictive measurement set by including a measure of the diameter (d) of apples in the plane perpendicular to the stem/calyx axis and 1.3 cm from the calyx end. Model parameter sets were developed using this measurement system with one caveat.…”
Section: Expanded Apple Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, numerous model parameter sets yield the same length and diameter but result in vastly different shapes. Whitelock et al (2006) developed a more restrictive measurement set by including a measure of the diameter (d) of apples in the plane perpendicular to the stem/calyx axis and 1.3 cm from the calyx end. Model parameter sets were developed using this measurement system with one caveat.…”
Section: Expanded Apple Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If φ is allowed to vary, then the optimization routine almost always returns the minimum value of φ allowed. Table 1 reproduces the table of apple cultivars and measurements in Whitelock et al (2006) and adds parameters for the corresponding optimal apple model.…”
Section: Expanded Apple Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is a long history of attempts to orient apples (Stout et al, 1971;Carlson, 1987;Throop et al, 2005;Whitelock et al, 2006). Unfortunately, the commercial impact of orientation systems continues to be limited due to mechanical complexity, cost, error, or some combination thereof.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%