2011
DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpr028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apples and Oranges? The Problem of Equivalence in Comparative Research

Abstract: Researchers in comparative research are increasingly relying on individual level data to test theories involving unobservable constructs like attitudes and preferences. Estimation is carried out using large-scale cross-national survey data providing responses from individuals living in widely varying contexts. This strategy rests on the assumption of equivalence, i.e. that no systematic distortion in response behavior of individuals from different countries exists. However this assumption is frequently violate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the uneven operation of knowledge predictors across groups suggests knowledge comparisons may involve ''apples and oranges'' (cf. Stegmueller 2011).…”
Section: Group Differences In Political Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the uneven operation of knowledge predictors across groups suggests knowledge comparisons may involve ''apples and oranges'' (cf. Stegmueller 2011).…”
Section: Group Differences In Political Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, differences between empirical findings may also be due to differences in data and estimation techniques used, or structural and institutional differences between countries and periods considered (see, e.g ., Stegmueller, ). The available evidence is not yet extensive enough to conduct a formal meta‐analysis, which is an, also in economics, increasingly popular methodology for synthesizing empirical findings ( e.g ., Poot, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important reason is the equivalence between research instruments that is required to reliably compare cultures or countries. Regardless of their topic of interest, researchers face the issue of whether their results can be reliably and meaningfully compared or are like 'apples and oranges' (Stegmueller, 2011). Most researchers are fully aware of this and acknowledge the existence of country heterogeneity in attitudes and preferences.…”
Section: Cross-cultural Research and Problems Of Equivalencementioning
confidence: 99%