1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(98)00420-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of the standard k–ε turbulence model to the dynamic simulation of bubble columns: Part I. Detailed numerical simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
191
1
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
191
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hu and Celik reported that the predicted mean quantities (such as mean liquid velocity field) were in good agreement with the experimental data of Sokolichin and Eigenberger [54], as shown in Figure 11, and further gave an accurate International Journal of Chemical Engineering prediction of the instantaneous flow features, including liquid velocity fluctuations and unsteady bubble dispersion pattern. Hu and Celik also studied the influence of the Smagorinsky constant and found that the constant for multiphase systems falls in a relatively smaller range than for single-phase flows.…”
Section: Hu and Celiksupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Hu and Celik reported that the predicted mean quantities (such as mean liquid velocity field) were in good agreement with the experimental data of Sokolichin and Eigenberger [54], as shown in Figure 11, and further gave an accurate International Journal of Chemical Engineering prediction of the instantaneous flow features, including liquid velocity fluctuations and unsteady bubble dispersion pattern. Hu and Celik also studied the influence of the Smagorinsky constant and found that the constant for multiphase systems falls in a relatively smaller range than for single-phase flows.…”
Section: Hu and Celiksupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Their results were proved by and Talvy et al (2007). Sokolichin and Eigenberger (1999) simulated a bubble column in two and three dimensions for laminar and turbulent models in unsteady state conditions. Their experimental results confirmed the turbulent character of flow structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is more typical for turbulent flows. Hence, they performed extensive numerical calculations and conducted several experiments after which they concluded that turbulence models are more convenient to describe flow fields in bubble columns [3,43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%