2013
DOI: 10.2298/sarh1308454l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of visual-analogue scale in patients with orofacial pain

Abstract: Applying VAS in the evaluation of acute and chronic pain can indicate progression or regression of pathological state under clinical conditions. This study showed that VAS, as a method for follow-up of pathological state, is more applicable and efficient when applied in chronic pain evaluation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Self-reported data was obtained from 43 (61.4%) children that were testable and capable of providing required information, while their caregivers provided data for all participating children. Most of the caregivers were mothers 58 (82.9%).In the examined sample,27 (38.6%) of children had spastic hemiplegia, 19 (27.1%) each had spastic quadriplegia and spastic diplegia, 3 (4.3%) of children had ataxic form of CP, while 2 (2.9%) of children had a dyskinetic form. GMFCS Level I was noted in 26 (37.1%) of participating children, 14 (20%) were at Level II, 10 (14.3%) at Level III, 7 (10%) at Level IV, and 13 (18.6%) of children were at Level V (Table1.).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Self-reported data was obtained from 43 (61.4%) children that were testable and capable of providing required information, while their caregivers provided data for all participating children. Most of the caregivers were mothers 58 (82.9%).In the examined sample,27 (38.6%) of children had spastic hemiplegia, 19 (27.1%) each had spastic quadriplegia and spastic diplegia, 3 (4.3%) of children had ataxic form of CP, while 2 (2.9%) of children had a dyskinetic form. GMFCS Level I was noted in 26 (37.1%) of participating children, 14 (20%) were at Level II, 10 (14.3%) at Level III, 7 (10%) at Level IV, and 13 (18.6%) of children were at Level V (Table1.).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…, and pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), whereby ratings were provided by the children and/or their caregivers (parents, grandparents, or foster carers). The VAS is a valid and reliable measure for rating pain intensity, requiring participants to mark subjective pain experience on a 10 cm-long line, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain) [14,26,27]. In the present study, the scale was used to rate musculoskeletal pain, headache and/or stomachache.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%