2009
DOI: 10.2217/14750708.6.2.145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application and comparison of the AUA and EAU current recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis in the urologic patient undergoing office procedures

Abstract: The significant and frequent morbidity of post-procedural urinary tract infections has resulted in both the American Urological Association and European Association of Urology developing guidelines and recommendations. The difficulty with any guideline is the practical application to the office setting. The goal is to effectively and safely evaluate and treat patients by efficient and cost-sensitive means. By creating an algorithm to aid in the application of the guidelines, the clinician can identify the high… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 The American hours of antimicrobial prophylaxis for most urological procedures. 5,6 However, a risk-benefit analysis must be performed for each patient, maintaining a lower threshold for a longer duration of antibiotic administration in high-risk patients. Urinary tract infections are especially prevalent among the SCI/D population with neurogenic bladder and asymptomatic bacteriuria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The American hours of antimicrobial prophylaxis for most urological procedures. 5,6 However, a risk-benefit analysis must be performed for each patient, maintaining a lower threshold for a longer duration of antibiotic administration in high-risk patients. Urinary tract infections are especially prevalent among the SCI/D population with neurogenic bladder and asymptomatic bacteriuria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%