“…The advancement of participation by a proximal or distal functionality as a rationale for stereocontrol is by no means limited to esters. Indeed, stereodirecting participation by halides, ethers, thioethers, nitrogen heterocycles, and an array of o -functionalized benzyl ethers, through cyclic ions of varying size, has been invoked on many occasions in the literature of glycosidic bond formation, with important work by the Boons, , Fairbanks, − Demchenko, , and Turnbull − laboratories, among many others. − As the focus of this review is on the mechanisms of stereodirecting participation by esters, and as a review has recently appeared on participation by ether type groups, this extensive area is not covered here other than to note the parallels with participation by esters. Thus, important issues involve the possible involvement of fused and bridging ions versus that of glycosyl oxocarbenium ions or reactive intermediates such as glycosyl triflates in the transition state for glycosidic bond formation, with evidence presented both for, and against, dependent on the system and conditions under study. ,,− This delicate balance between stereodirecting participation and alternative mechanisms is a prominent feature of the involvement of esters in glycosylation and apparent from the comparison of a recent study on 1,2- trans -glycosylation directed by the presence of 2- O -alkoxymethyl methyl groups, and one of the many instances of intramolecular aglycone delivery, a common strategy for 1,2- cis glycoside formation (Scheme ).…”