2017
DOI: 10.5585/iji.v5i3.206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a Process Model for the Management of Intellectual Property in a Technology Licensing Office from a Brazilian Research Center

Abstract: In Brazil, the Technology Licensing Office (TLO) are responsible for managing the innovation policy of Scientific and Technological Institutions (STI). However, when analyzing the functioning of the TLO is possible to observe that these are organizations that still require capacitation to perform with efficiency and efficacy of its functions. Thus, the aim of this paper is to report the application of a model for the management of Intellectual Property (IP) in the TLO of the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Esp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Undoubtedly, information support and its organization play an important role in intellectual property management, but the use of information also depends significantly, in particular, on a number of organizational and human management factors. In [36], the authors suggest managing intellectual property focusing only on technology protection and commercialization. In [37], it is noted that the intellectual property management system should not duplicate the functions of other management systems (marketing, production, etc.)…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undoubtedly, information support and its organization play an important role in intellectual property management, but the use of information also depends significantly, in particular, on a number of organizational and human management factors. In [36], the authors suggest managing intellectual property focusing only on technology protection and commercialization. In [37], it is noted that the intellectual property management system should not duplicate the functions of other management systems (marketing, production, etc.)…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this study aims to fill this gap, recognizing within the context of startups, the value co-creation wastes. In this sense, Andrade et al, (2017) and Andrade et al, (2016) consider out that the interaction process, specifically for open innovation processes, which applies to value co-creation, are complex as they occur with players with different methodologies, times, concerns, and goals. In addition, for these authors, players also suffer from bureaucratic processes that increase the lead time of the operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, once recognize the wastes in this context, the emphasis concentrates in demonstrate the positive aspects of the value co-creation among players that generate value in relation B2B (Business to Business), this way transposing the disadvantages, the risks, and the fragilities linked to the relationship among the enterprises and stimulate the advantages this interaction (Heidenreich et al 2015). This way, it is emphasized that value co-creation in startups may not always produce desirable results, for example, actors may enter into conflicts and/or partners may present opportunistic behavior, difficulties in managing intellectual property, which negatively impacts the value co-creation process, reducing the performance, and business competitive advantages (Abosag et al 2016, Chowdhury et al 2016Andrade et al, 2016;Andrade et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve greater success in the commercialization of technologies, Andrade (2016), Andrade et al (2017;2016a) points out the need to know the technology and its market potential in detail, so that strategies for its commercialization can be elaborated. Furthermore, the involvement of the technology inventor with the commercialization process also causes more favorable conditions for the conclusion of the commercial process (AGRAWAL, 2006), as well as the predisposition of scientists to continue with TT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is extremely important that there is a more concrete, formal and assertive process regarding the OT. This means that, for each technology, a different marketing strategy is elaborated, following Andrade (2016) and Andrade (2017;2016a;2016c). This requires elaborating a commercial profile about the technology, which aims to present the technology, as well as the solutions to the problems it proposes to solve, its potential markets and applications, in addition to the potential users and rate of growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%