2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of BIOME-BGC model to managed forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fine root growth at depth is likely to increase the resilience of forests ecosystems to climate change, providing access to water pools stored in deep soil layers during rainfall seasons. Although process-based models are largely dependent on reliable estimations of water availability, the ability of trees to take up water in very deep soil layers throughout their development is still poorly known (Jackson et al 2000, Tatarinov andCienciala 2006). A relationship making it possible to assess the volume of soil explored by fine roots from aboveground trees attributes (extensively studied) would then be highly valuable to improve current tree growth models on deep tropical soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fine root growth at depth is likely to increase the resilience of forests ecosystems to climate change, providing access to water pools stored in deep soil layers during rainfall seasons. Although process-based models are largely dependent on reliable estimations of water availability, the ability of trees to take up water in very deep soil layers throughout their development is still poorly known (Jackson et al 2000, Tatarinov andCienciala 2006). A relationship making it possible to assess the volume of soil explored by fine roots from aboveground trees attributes (extensively studied) would then be highly valuable to improve current tree growth models on deep tropical soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, changes of WPMF modify the plant carbon stocks (mainly stem and coarse root carbon stocks) without sub stantially altering all other pools, which are constrained by higher turn-over rates . Due to the same logic, WPMF changes do not significantly alter all main BIOME-BGC photosynthesis and respiration estimates (Tatarinov & Cienciala 2006).…”
Section: Forestmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This ap proach is based on the modification of a ma jor parameter setting which controls carbon accumulation in the vegetation compartment, WPMF (Tatarinov & Cienciala 2006). The modification is performed by taking as refe rence values the maximum standing volumes derived from various forest inventories.…”
Section: Simulation Of Mean Canopy Covers and Caismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity analysis has acquired a strong position as a method for evaluating models (IAEA 1989, Prisley and Mortimer 2004, Medlyn et al 2005, Nalder and Wein 2006, Tatarinov and Cienciala 2006 as it addresses issues such as model robustness, the stability of model parameters, and the variability of model outputs. Sensitivity analysis is also an important part of model uncertainty analysis as it identifies the components of a model that are potentially important contributors to the overall uncertainty of the model.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%