2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.85.043518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of cross correlations between CMB and large-scale structure to constraints on the primordial non-Gaussianity

Abstract: The primordial non-Gaussianity of local type affects the clustering of dark matter halos, and the planned deep and wide photometric surveys are suitable for examining this class of non-Gaussianity. In our previous paper, we investigated the constraint from the cross correlation between CMB lensing potential and galaxy angular distribution on the primordial non-Gaussianity, without taking into account redshift slicing. To improve our previous analysis, in this paper, we add the galaxy lensing shear into our ana… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This improvement stems from the reduction of the galaxy bias uncertainty by cross correlating the different observables [11,73,88]. From the transverse mode information in the 2-dimensional angular correlations, the galaxy bias can be inferred from the ratios of the galaxy power spectrum (dependent on the bias squared), the lensing shear power (independent of the bias) and their cross correlation (linearly dependent on the bias), because they have the different dependence on the bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This improvement stems from the reduction of the galaxy bias uncertainty by cross correlating the different observables [11,73,88]. From the transverse mode information in the 2-dimensional angular correlations, the galaxy bias can be inferred from the ratios of the galaxy power spectrum (dependent on the bias squared), the lensing shear power (independent of the bias) and their cross correlation (linearly dependent on the bias), because they have the different dependence on the bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the angular power spectrum, we consider the CMB and the photometric redshift survey observables (T, E, ψ, {g}, {γ}). We take into account the tomographic survey, and {g} = {g 1 , .., g N To take account of the different sky coverage for the CMB and the photometric redshift surveys, we define the total Fisher matrix for the angular power spectrum as [73];…”
Section: The Fisher Matrix For the Angular Power Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is clearly seen in the 2 The expected errors on f NL for HSC are somewhat degraded compared to the previous study by Refs. [6,7]. These differences mainly come from the choice of minimum multipole, min .…”
Section: Forecast Constraints On Primordial Non-gaussianitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If occurring, PNG would have a significant effect both on CMB and cosmic structures. As a matter of fact, the issue of constraining deviations from primordial Gaussianity by using structure formation and evolution has recently attracted much attention in the literature, with efforts directed towards the abundance of dark matter halos [11][12][13][14][15][16], halo biasing [17][18][19][20][21][22]), galaxy bispectrum [23,24], mass density distribution [25] and topology [26,27], integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect [28][29][30], Lyα flux from low-density intergalactic medium [31], 21−cm fluctuations [32,33], reionization [34], and weak lensing peak counts [35,36]. PNG is one of the very few handle that we have on the prerecombination universe, and it is hence important to study it in detail and with different probes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%