We explore the observability of the neutral hydrogen (H i) and the singly-ionized isotope helium-3 ( 3 He ii) in the intergalactic medium (IGM) from the Epoch of Reionization down to the local Universe. The hyperfine transition of 3 He ii, which is not as well known as the H i transition, has energy splitting corresponding to 8 cm. It also has a larger spontaneous decay rate than that of neutral hydrogen, whereas its primordial abundance is much smaller. Although both species are mostly ionized in the IGM, the balance between ionization and recombination in moderately high density regions renders them abundant enough to be observed. We estimate the emission signal of both hyperfine transitions from large scale filamentary structures and discuss the prospects for observing them with current and future radio telescopes. We conclude that H i in filaments is possibly observable even with current telescopes after 100 hours of observation. On the other hand, 3 He ii is only detectable with future telescopes, such as SKA, after the same amount of time.

The primordial non-Gaussianity of local type affects the clustering of dark matter halos, and the planned deep and wide photometric surveys are suitable for examining this class of non-Gaussianity. In our previous paper, we investigated the constraint from the cross correlation between CMB lensing potential and galaxy angular distribution on the primordial non-Gaussianity, without taking into account redshift slicing. To improve our previous analysis, in this paper, we add the galaxy lensing shear into our analysis and take into account redshift slicing to follow the redshift evolution of the clustering. By calculating 81 power spectra and using the Fisher matrix method, we find that the constraint on the primordial non-Gaussianity can be improved from ∆fNL ∼ 5.4 to 5.1 by including the galaxy-galaxy lensing shear cross correlations expected from the Hyper Suprime-Cam survey (HSC), in comparison with the constraint without any cross correlations. Moreover, the constraint can go down to ∆fNL ∼ 4.8 by including the galaxy-CMB lensing cross correlations from the ACTPol and Planck experiments.PACS numbers: 98.62.Sb,

No abstract

Abstract.We investigate how much the constraints on the neutrino properties can be improved by combining the CMB, the photometric and spectroscopic galaxy redshift surveys which include the CMB lensing, galaxy lensing tomography, galaxy clustering and redshift space distortion observables. We pay a particular attention to the constraint on the neutrino mass in view of the forthcoming redshift surveys such as the Euclid satellite and the LSST survey along with the Planck CMB lensing measurements. Combining the transverse mode information from the angular power spectrum and the longitudinal mode information from the spectroscopic survey with the redshift space distortion measurements can determine the total neutrino mass with the projected error of O(0.02)eV. Our analysis fixes the mass splittings among the neutrino species to be consistent with the neutrino oscillation data, and we accordingly study the sensitivity of our parameter estimations on the minimal neutrino mass. The cosmological measurement of the total neutrino mass can distinguish between the normal and inverted mass hierarchy scenarios if the minimal neutrino mass 0.005 eV with the predicted 1-σ uncertainties taken into account.

Quintessence, a scalar field model, has been proposed to account for the acceleration of the Universe at present. We discuss how accurately quintessence models are discriminated by future cosmological surveys, which include experiments of CMB, galaxy clustering, weak lensing, and the type Ia SNe surveys, by making use of the conventional parameterized dark energy models. We can see clear differences between the thawing and the freezing quintessence models at more than 1σ (2σ) confidence level as long as the present equation of state for quintessence is away from −1 as w X > ∼ − 0.95 (−0.90). However, it is found to be difficult to probe the effective mass squared for the potential in thawing models, whose signs are different between the quadratic and the cosine-type potentials. This fact may require us to invent a new estimator to distinguish quintessence models beyond the thawing and the freezing ones.