2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Cytosense flow cytometer for the analysis of airborne bacteria collected by a high volume impingement sampler

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantification of bacterial concentrations ( c cells ) in 7 snow and 2 air samples was performed by flow cytometry , using a NovoCyte ACEA (Biosciences Inc., LOD: 0.2–50 mm cell size). Flow cytometry is a technique that quantifies cells, which can be labeled with fluorescent markers, in a liquid suspension.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantification of bacterial concentrations ( c cells ) in 7 snow and 2 air samples was performed by flow cytometry , using a NovoCyte ACEA (Biosciences Inc., LOD: 0.2–50 mm cell size). Flow cytometry is a technique that quantifies cells, which can be labeled with fluorescent markers, in a liquid suspension.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On two of the visits, the sampling procedure was performed twice (morning and evening) resulting in a total of seven samplings included in the investigation. Bioaerosols were collected from the outlets of the ventilation system of the farm and from the area around the farm by Kärchner DS5800 vacuum-cleaners functioning as impingers as described earlier (12,13). The sampling was performed as described by Jang et al (13) with 2 L of PBS in the vortex chamber and the vacuum-cleaner running with a flow-rate of 1.5 m 3 /min.…”
Section: Description Of Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Cytosense flow cytometer (Cytobouy) was used to evaluate bacterial cell density, and its results were compared to quantitative PCR (qPCR). The regression analysis of this work showed that the evaluation of bacterial cell densities in both methods are almost the same, and the results proved that the proposed approach was most reliable for the estimation of bacterial cell densities in an outdoor environment [ 67 ].…”
Section: Bioaerosol Samplingmentioning
confidence: 98%