Aiaa Space 2016 2016
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-5649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Design of Experiments and Surrogate Modeling within the NASA Advanced Concepts Office, Earth-to-Orbit Design Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These tools are both widely accepted by the launch vehicle design community and utilize direct shooting and direct collocation optimization schemes, respectively. 17 While results from POST and its main competitor OTIS arrive at very similar solutions, 18 POST is used here and in the previous work because it is the tool in use at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center's Advanced Concepts Office 19,20 (ACO).…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These tools are both widely accepted by the launch vehicle design community and utilize direct shooting and direct collocation optimization schemes, respectively. 17 While results from POST and its main competitor OTIS arrive at very similar solutions, 18 POST is used here and in the previous work because it is the tool in use at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center's Advanced Concepts Office 19,20 (ACO).…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Their approach applies the concepts of DOE and response surface metamodel to more exhaustively explore the trade space and supply the customer with additional design information to inform decision making. 53 In the case of nondeterministic trajectory design optimization problems, a very few research have been presented until now. Most of them have been focused on the conceptual design of LV not specifically on the trajectory design problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 The percent error distributions of the resulting surrogates can be seen in Figure 7 below. As depicted in the figure, the surrogate from the random repetitions method had a maximum error of 5.2% with a standard deviation around one.…”
Section: Ivd Surrogate Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DOE's for these trades were very similar to those laid out in the previous work and focused on upper stage parameters. 4,16,17 Both sets in this case were run over similar time periods, each using the same parallel computing resources with 80 available threads. The random repetitions data was executed over the course of two and a half days, while the SVM data ran for just under three days.…”
Section: Ivd Surrogate Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%