2014
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01400-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of DNA Chip Scanning Technology for Automatic Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae Inclusions

Abstract: e Chlamydiae are obligate intracellular bacteria that propagate in the inclusion, a specific niche inside the host cell. The standard method for counting chlamydiae is immunofluorescent staining and manual counting of chlamydial inclusions. High-or medium-throughput estimation of the reduction in chlamydial inclusions should be the basis of testing antichlamydial compounds and other drugs that positively or negatively influence chlamydial growth, yet low-throughput manual counting is the common approach. To ov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described previously (Bogdanov et al . ), the slide was scanned with a DNA‐chip scanner, and the ChlamyCount software was used to enumerate the chlamydial inclusions. ChlamyCount inclusion number counts supported the qPCR results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As described previously (Bogdanov et al . ), the slide was scanned with a DNA‐chip scanner, and the ChlamyCount software was used to enumerate the chlamydial inclusions. ChlamyCount inclusion number counts supported the qPCR results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image processing and automatic counting of chlamydial inclusions were performed by the ChlamyCount software, as described previously (Bogdanov et al . ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason could be that the dynamic range of our immunofluorescent ChlamyCount method was about 2 log 10 (Bogdanov et al . ), while the qPCR method's dynamic range was approx. 5 log 10 (Eszik et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inclusion counts were determined by the ChlamyCount software as it was described before (Bogdanov et al . ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%