1980
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400020013x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Elovich Equation to the Kinetics of Phosphate Release and Sorption in Soils

Abstract: Experimental data on the phosphate release and sorption in soils, when inadequately described by a first‐order kinetic reaction, are often interpreted as a combination of two or three simultaneous first‐order reactions. A simple modified Elovich equation in the form: q = (1/β) ln (αβ) + (1/β) ln t was derived to fit the reported experimental data in literature that failed to conform to a single first‐order kinetic equation. In this equation, q is the amount of phosphate released or sorbed, and α and β are cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

17
533
2
20

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,504 publications
(572 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
17
533
2
20
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the data fit the equations proposed by Kuo & Lotse (1974), Barrow & Shaw (1975) and Panda (1978) (Table 3), but not the equation proposed by Chien & Clayton (1980). Lack of fitting to the equation of Chien & Clayton (1980) possibly occurred because the assumption of the equation (αβ t > 1) was not met.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In general, the data fit the equations proposed by Kuo & Lotse (1974), Barrow & Shaw (1975) and Panda (1978) (Table 3), but not the equation proposed by Chien & Clayton (1980). Lack of fitting to the equation of Chien & Clayton (1980) possibly occurred because the assumption of the equation (αβ t > 1) was not met.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Lack of fitting to the equation of Chien & Clayton (1980) possibly occurred because the assumption of the equation (αβ t > 1) was not met. Thus, the data of the coefficient of this equation were not presented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations