2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2005.1554798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Evolutionary Algorithm on a Transportation Scheduling Problem - The Mass Rapid Transit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
14
0

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kwan and Chang (2005) applied a heuristic-based evolutionary algorithm to optimize the frequency (or headway) between trains, where the operation costs and the passenger dissatisfaction are included in the performance index. Liebchen (2006Liebchen ( , 2008 formulated the train scheduling problem as a periodic event-scheduling problem based on a graph model and obtained periodic schedules for the Berlin subway system using genetic algorithms and integer programming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kwan and Chang (2005) applied a heuristic-based evolutionary algorithm to optimize the frequency (or headway) between trains, where the operation costs and the passenger dissatisfaction are included in the performance index. Liebchen (2006Liebchen ( , 2008 formulated the train scheduling problem as a periodic event-scheduling problem based on a graph model and obtained periodic schedules for the Berlin subway system using genetic algorithms and integer programming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, when the passenger arrival process at stations follows some particular probability distributions, such as uniform and Poisson distributions, a regular schedule with fixed headway between consecutive vehicles can reduce the total passenger waiting time effectively [5,6]. However, using regular schedules may result in longer passenger waiting time and travel time during over-saturated periods [7]. Some studies [7,8] paid attention to semi-regular or half-regular timetables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Pareto optimality method is more practical, which can provide more information to operators when determining an optimal train timetable, that is, list more compromise solutions to let the operator choose according to the circumstances of urban rail system. Kwan and Chang 15 introduced Pareto optimality, but the variables in their model are relatively simplified, which limits its application. In this article, therefore, a Pareto optimal urban rail train scheduling problem, which is more realistic and helpful, is proposed, in which the PTTT and the number of used train stocks are chosen as objectives to represent the service quality and operation cost, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%