2020
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.570333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of FF-QuantSC for the Precise Estimation of Fetal Fraction in Non-invasive Prenatal Testing in Two SRY-Translocation Cases

Abstract: Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a commonly employed clinical method to screen for fetal aneuploidy, while the Y chromosome-based NIPT method is regarded as the gold standard for the estimation of fetal fraction (FF) of male fetuses. However, when the fetus has a derivative Y chromosome thereby containing a partial Y chromosome, the Y chromosome-based NIPT method cannot accurately calculate FF. Therefore, alternative methods to precisely calculate FF are required. Methods: Two prenatal cases… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Re-evaluations using the FF-QuantSC method and analysis of distribution patterns of Y-chromosome reads may lead to more accurate results for samples with a repeatedly low FF, especially for derived chromosomes containing part of the Y-chromosome (121). In this manner, rare cases of sex reversal caused by SRY translocation could avoid being misjudged as detection failures by Y-chromosome-based FF calculation methods.…”
Section: Methods For Calculation Ffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Re-evaluations using the FF-QuantSC method and analysis of distribution patterns of Y-chromosome reads may lead to more accurate results for samples with a repeatedly low FF, especially for derived chromosomes containing part of the Y-chromosome (121). In this manner, rare cases of sex reversal caused by SRY translocation could avoid being misjudged as detection failures by Y-chromosome-based FF calculation methods.…”
Section: Methods For Calculation Ffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a Y‐chromosome‐based FF estimator and the native algorithm default. Y‐chromosome‐based methods provide accurate FF estimates in male fetus pregnancies, 41,42 allowing non‐informative case reclassification and more accurate/objective assessments of concordance rates and cfDNA testing performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 We used a Y-chromosome-based FF estimator and the native algorithm default. Y-chromosome-based methods provide accurate FF estimates in male fetus pregnancies, 41,42 F I G U R E 1 Fetal fraction variation according to gestational age. No significant differences were found in FF among the different GAs studied, suggesting that the time of fetal arrest does not influence the informativeness of the results.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After pooling, denaturation and cyclization were carried out to generate single-stranded DNA circles, which would then form DNA Nanoballs (DNBs) by rolling circle replication (RCR). These DNBs were then quantified (8–40 ng/µL) and loaded onto sequencing chips, followed by sequencing on the MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform (MGI, Shenzhen, China) [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a male fetus, the fetal fraction could be calculated by the proportion of reads mapping to the Y chromosome relative to those mapping to the whole genome. The fetal fraction in pregnancies with female fetuses was estimated using the FF-QuantSC algorithm previously developed by BGI [ 25 , 28 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%