1994
DOI: 10.3109/03639049409050214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Flow-Through Dissolution Method for the Evaluation of Oral Formulations of Nifedipine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flow through method was chosen because of its ability to simulate the in vivo hydrodynamics better compared with the USP Apparatus 1 or 2, thus allowing a more close simulation of the pH gradient in the GI tract (17,18). Dissolution tests were also performed in the USP Apparatus 2 using FaSSIF and the USP-SIF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow through method was chosen because of its ability to simulate the in vivo hydrodynamics better compared with the USP Apparatus 1 or 2, thus allowing a more close simulation of the pH gradient in the GI tract (17,18). Dissolution tests were also performed in the USP Apparatus 2 using FaSSIF and the USP-SIF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with USP I/II dissolution methods, FTC methods have the advantage of allowing a change in the dissolution medium during each run, which allows for better simulation of the pH gradient and fluids associated with transit throughout the gastrointestinal tract (Thoma and Ziegler, 1998). Also, they simulate in vivo hydrodynamics more closely than the USP I/II dissolution methods (Perng et al, 2003;Qureshi et al, 1994), and demonstrate good in vitro/in vivo correlations (Derendorf et al, 1983;Ikegami et al, 2003;Qureshi et al, 1994;Sunesen et al, 2005). Another advantage is that FTC methods at low flow rates are more sensitive to detect differences in the disintegration properties than other USP dissolution methods (Wennergren et al, 1989).…”
Section: Usp Dissolution Methods With Flow-through Cells (Ftc)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…USP dissolution FTC methods have been used to evaluate drug dissolution/precipitation of various oral solid dosage forms (Emara et al, 2000;Wirbitzki, 1990, 1993;Nicklasson et al, 1987;Perng et al, 2003;Phillips et al, 1989;Qureshi et al, 1994;Sunesen et al, 2005;Wennergren et al, 1989). Compared with USP I/II dissolution methods, FTC methods have the advantage of allowing a change in the dissolution medium during each run, which allows for better simulation of the pH gradient and fluids associated with transit throughout the gastrointestinal tract (Thoma and Ziegler, 1998).…”
Section: Usp Dissolution Methods With Flow-through Cells (Ftc)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Data acquired via FTC could be correlated well to that of the paddle method (13,40) and to in vivo data (41)(42)(43)(44). Because of the widespread development of poorly soluble compounds in the pharmaceutical industry, the FTC will gain importance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%