2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of fractional-order derivative in the quantitative estimation of soil organic matter content through visible and near-infrared spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The cumulative variance contribution rate of the first three PC S was greater than 90%. The eigenvector of PC1 (explaining 71.01% of the total spectral variation) presented three positive peaks within 400-609, 1329-1645 and 1860-2089 nm that can be attributed to the presence of Fe oxides, haematite, O-H, humic acid and smectite [7,50]. In the second PC (explaining 15.38% of the total spectral change), the kurtosis of the positive peak within 400-609 nm was significantly enhanced, while the positive peaks within 1412-1645 and 1860-2089 nm were converted to kurtosis weaker negative peaks [45].…”
Section: Spectral Characteristic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cumulative variance contribution rate of the first three PC S was greater than 90%. The eigenvector of PC1 (explaining 71.01% of the total spectral variation) presented three positive peaks within 400-609, 1329-1645 and 1860-2089 nm that can be attributed to the presence of Fe oxides, haematite, O-H, humic acid and smectite [7,50]. In the second PC (explaining 15.38% of the total spectral change), the kurtosis of the positive peak within 400-609 nm was significantly enhanced, while the positive peaks within 1412-1645 and 1860-2089 nm were converted to kurtosis weaker negative peaks [45].…”
Section: Spectral Characteristic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-processing steps included: visual overlaying of spectra, averaging of spectra for initial visualization, and data extraction to ASCII file format ( Figure 2). The sampled spectral reflectance values were converted and exported as 1st derivative spectra to reduce the effect of amplitude variation between sample readings and emphasize areas of spectral change [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was necessary to preprocess the original spectra due to the uneven intensity of light sources at different wavelengths and the influence of instrument noise. In this paper, the spectra were processed using ten preprocessing methods, including multiplicative scatter correction (MSC) [ 23 ], standardized normal variate (SNV) [ 24 ], normalization [ 25 ], autoscales [ 26 ], mean centering (MC) [ 27 ], moving average method (MA) [ 28 ], detrend fluctuation analysis (Detrend) [ 29 ], Savitsky–Golay smoothing (SG) [ 30 ], Savitsky–Golay first derivative (SG-FD) [ 31 ], and Savitsky–Golay second derivative (SG-SD) [ 32 ]. To reduce calculation and increase calculation speed, competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS) [ 33 ], principal components analysis (PCA) [ 34 ], and successive projections algorithm (SPA) [ 35 ] are preferable to extract feature wavelengths to reduce the dimensionality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%