AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2011
DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-6677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of H-infinity fault diagnosis to ADDSAFE benchmark: the control surface jamming case

Abstract: In this article the H  fault detection and diagnosis technique is applied to a representative twin-engine civil commercial aircraft. The specific failure scenario contemplated concerns the detection of an abnormal aircraft behavior leading to the degradation of the aircraft performance. This abnormal configuration is caused by an actuator or a sensor failure in the control loop of a control surface, between the Flight Control Computer and the moving surface, including these two elements. The definition of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work described in [31,32,33,34,35,28] are examples of other approaches to actuator jam/runaway failure detection within ADDSAFE. The work in [31,34] uses a mathematical model of the actuator to design the FDD scheme and therefore requires a low order observer scheme.…”
Section: Actuator Jam/runaway Benchmark Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The work described in [31,32,33,34,35,28] are examples of other approaches to actuator jam/runaway failure detection within ADDSAFE. The work in [31,34] uses a mathematical model of the actuator to design the FDD scheme and therefore requires a low order observer scheme.…”
Section: Actuator Jam/runaway Benchmark Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [35] an LPV representation of the nonlinear actuator model is used as the basis for the observer design. The work in [32,33] consider a more 'global' approach where a typical lateral aircraft model is used as the basis for an observer to generate residuals which are evaluated to detect the presence of an actuator jam or runaway.…”
Section: Actuator Jam/runaway Benchmark Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced methods as LPV techniques in [2] and [3], sliding mode observers in [4], nonlinear observer based approaches in [5] and H ∞ techniques in [6] have been applied to monitor hydraulic actuator systems of modern aircraft locally, i.e., by looking at the input-output dynamics of the actuator. System wide monitoring approaches using the input-output behavior of the overall aircraft dynamics are provided by [7] and [8]. [9] proposes a hybrid system combining local and system wide fault detection approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pure global approaches are provided e.g. by [3] and [4]. While various approaches are able to detect faults in an actuation system quite well, none of them tries to distinguish between physical faults of the actuator and faulty sensors, necessary in the actuation system to close the actuator's control loop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…additive sensor fault vector f s allows the modeling of three sensor faults f s,1 , f s,2 and f s,3 . For example a freezing of the third sensor at the position c f is created by selecting f s,3 = −x + c f .Setting the parameters ρ in(3) to constant values and including the defined fault and noise inputs leads to the first order linear model of the actuation systeṁ…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%