2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of in vitro anthelmintic sensitivity assays to canine parasitology: Detecting resistance to pyrantel in Ancylostoma caninum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
80
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two isolates of A. caninum were used for these experiments: an isolate with high-level resistance to pyrantel, designated isolate PR, and an isolate with low-level resistance to pyrantel, designated isolate NT. These isolates have previously been described in detail (11). Briefly, isolate PR was sourced from a pool of isolates recovered from dogs in metropolitan Brisbane, Australia, while isolate NT was sourced from a puppy in an aboriginal community in the Northern Territory, Australia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Two isolates of A. caninum were used for these experiments: an isolate with high-level resistance to pyrantel, designated isolate PR, and an isolate with low-level resistance to pyrantel, designated isolate NT. These isolates have previously been described in detail (11). Briefly, isolate PR was sourced from a pool of isolates recovered from dogs in metropolitan Brisbane, Australia, while isolate NT was sourced from a puppy in an aboriginal community in the Northern Territory, Australia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, isolate PR was sourced from a pool of isolates recovered from dogs in metropolitan Brisbane, Australia, while isolate NT was sourced from a puppy in an aboriginal community in the Northern Territory, Australia. A direct in vivo comparison of these isolates by the use of an abbreviated critical trial (7) revealed that the clinical efficacy of pyrantel was 25% against isolate PR and 71% against isolate NT on the basis of the proportion of adult worms expelled during the trial (11).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations