2015
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2015.2394808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Amplitude and Phase Noise Characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For optical communication applications, we use the extended Kalman filter (EKF), which linearizes the measurement equation around the current value of the state vector [15]. It is generally more accurate to use filtering recursion equations specifically formulated for the nonlinear case, such as the particle filter (PF) [10], [16], which we also apply to the laser characterization problem, or the unscented Kalman filter (UKF) [17], [18], though these techniques have increased computational complexity.…”
Section: Semiconductor Laser Phase Tracking In a Bayesian Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For optical communication applications, we use the extended Kalman filter (EKF), which linearizes the measurement equation around the current value of the state vector [15]. It is generally more accurate to use filtering recursion equations specifically formulated for the nonlinear case, such as the particle filter (PF) [10], [16], which we also apply to the laser characterization problem, or the unscented Kalman filter (UKF) [17], [18], though these techniques have increased computational complexity.…”
Section: Semiconductor Laser Phase Tracking In a Bayesian Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 8 shows the experimental BER performance of polarization multiplexed 28 GBd 16 QAM for an SCL with a Lorentzian linewidth of 500 kHz, 1 GHz relaxation resonance frequency, and 0.1 ns damping factor when demodulated with the decision-directed phase-locked loop, the laser rate equation based Kalman filter, and an EKF that uses a Lorentzian laser model [10]. The DDPLL feedback parameters were optimized to yield the lowest BER: K v = 11e9, τ 1 = τ 2 = 16ns.…”
Section: B Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conventional time-domain approaches perform coherent detection in combination with digital signal processing (DSP) to cope with this issue [60,61], but as higher order modulation formats are implemented, the accuracy of the phase noise estimation is compromised in the presence of moderate measurement noise. Zibar et al [46] present a framework of Bayesian filtering in combination with expectation maximization (EM) to accurately characterize laser amplitude and phase noise that outperforms conventional approaches. Results demonstrate an accurate estimation of the phase noise even in the presence of large measurement noise.…”
Section: Characterization and Operation Of Transmittersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several methods within the framework of nonlinear state-space based Bayesian filtering, (extended Kalman and particle filter), have been employed for timevarying parameter estimation such as: amplitude and phase noise, cross-polarization and cross-phase modulation induced polarization scattering and polarization mode dispersion [3]- [8]. The advantages of the statespace based Bayesian filtering for time-varying parameter estimation are that: 1) the framework is very well suited for joint parameter estimation, 2) it allows for the inclusion of the underlying physics of optical components and optical fibre channel into the estimation algorithms and 3) it allows for more complicated models of the time-varying parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%