2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review

Abstract: The rational allocation of spatial resources is an important factor to ensure the sustainable development of rural areas, and effective pre-emptive spatial evaluation is the prerequisite for identifying the predicament of rural resource allocation. Multi-criteria decision-making analysis has advantages in solving multi-attribute and multi-objective decision-making problems, and has been used in sustainability evaluation research in various disciplines in recent years. Previous studies have proved the value of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective is to get support measures to judge each alternative until the overall top-ranked alternative is obtained. As compared to other methodologies, ranking methods are considered to be a complex methodology having non-intuitive inputs (Marqués et al, 2020); and lastly 4) Distance based MCDM methods that rank the alternates according to "shortest distance from the positive ideal solution and the longest distance from the negative ideal solution" (Hwang & Yoon, 1981), (Yuan et al, 2022). These methods include Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), VIšekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje or multi-criteria optimization and compromise solution (VIKOR), Multi-Objective Optimization based on Ratio Analysis (MOORA), Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area (MABAC), etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective is to get support measures to judge each alternative until the overall top-ranked alternative is obtained. As compared to other methodologies, ranking methods are considered to be a complex methodology having non-intuitive inputs (Marqués et al, 2020); and lastly 4) Distance based MCDM methods that rank the alternates according to "shortest distance from the positive ideal solution and the longest distance from the negative ideal solution" (Hwang & Yoon, 1981), (Yuan et al, 2022). These methods include Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), VIšekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje or multi-criteria optimization and compromise solution (VIKOR), Multi-Objective Optimization based on Ratio Analysis (MOORA), Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area (MABAC), etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the availability and uncertainty of information, as well as the ambiguity of human perception and cognition, most selection parameters cannot be given accurately. The Fuzzy overlay method solves the Subjective weight problem [ 52 ]. The fuzzy set provides a mathematical model to determine the membership degree of each element to the set so that the applicability evaluation data of various subjective standards and the weight of the standard are converted into numerical values by the language of the decision maker [ 53 , 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCDA, the abbreviation of multi-criteria analysis (MCA), is both an approach and a set of techniques with the goal of providing an overall ordering of options, from the most-preferred to the least-preferred option. Globally, the approach has been utilized, mostly recently, in other sectors such as energy (e.g., Arsenopoulos et al, 2021) and rural development (e.g., Yuan et al, 2022). However, our framework is unique in combining multiple tools in a system-wide context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%