2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.03.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of multivariate uncertainty analysis to frequency response function estimates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under these assumptions obtaining the normalized impedance is straightforward using the axial wavenumber from the transmission coefficient (Eqs. (25) and (26)), the Ingard-Myers boundary condition Eq. (6) plus the wave dispersion relationship Eq.…”
Section: Impedance Eduction Based On the Plane Wave Transmission Coefmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Under these assumptions obtaining the normalized impedance is straightforward using the axial wavenumber from the transmission coefficient (Eqs. (25) and (26)), the Ingard-Myers boundary condition Eq. (6) plus the wave dispersion relationship Eq.…”
Section: Impedance Eduction Based On the Plane Wave Transmission Coefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to get the 95 percent confidence interval results for complex-valued variables, the normal confidence interval should be extended to a confidence area for its possible correlated real and imaginary parts. For a normally distributed complex variable with a real part x R and an imaginary part x I , the confidence region is given by [24,25] x…”
Section: Uncertainty Propagation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their suggestion of using a bivariate description of complex uncertainty was further elaborated in [34]. In the field of structural dynamics, Schultz et al [35] adopted the same complex bivariate description for FRFs acquired using a random noise excitation, and further investigated the propagation of uncertainty from real and imaginary components onto magnitude and phase descriptors. Similarly, Kim and Schmitz [36] used a complex bivariate description in the analysis of measured tool-holder-spindle-machine assembly FRFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can hence offer a more flexible and accurate description because it can represent the uncertainty as an ellipse rather than a circle (compared to the complex statistics method). Multivariate uncertainty propagation has been applied to quantifying the measurement uncertainty in experimentally gathered data [15], [16] and to finite-element models [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%