Application of non-market valuation to California's coastal policy decisions

Raheem, Nejem; Colt, Steve; Fleishman, Erica; Talberth, John; Swedeen, Paula; Boyle, K. J.; Rudd, Murray A.; Lopez, Ricardo D.; Crocker, Daniel E.; Bohan, David; O’Higgins, Tim; Willer, C.; Boumans, Roelof

doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2012.01.005

Cited by 25 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…; Raheem et al . ). Spatially measured economic values are transferrable and comparable, they can aid the mapping of ecosystem services (Fisher et al .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Unlike some ecosystem services (Raheem et al . ), it is appropriate and relatively straightforward to spatially value fisheries, for example ‘per ha’ or ‘per stream km’. However, it is important to also consider the spatial scale from which data are collected as ecosystem services require a minimum area to function (Fisher et al .…”

Section: Recommendations For Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Current status and future needs of economics research of inland fisheries

Grantham

Rudd

2015

Fisheries Management Eco

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inland capture fisheries (ICFs) provide ecosystem services -fish for food, livelihoods and recreation -to people and therefore have an economic value. Economic valuation can inform the sustainable management of ICFs and ensure they are recognised in trade-off analysis and decision-making. This study assesses existing ICFs economic research to identify knowledge gaps. Bibliographic databases were searched for suitable peer-reviewed articles. The selected studies (n = 75) were analysed for coverage, valuation methodologies and value metrics. A majority of existing studies value recreational ICFs in developed countries. Studies have employed a wide range of valuation methodologies and therefore provide a variety of economic values measured at different units and scales. This study highlights the need for a greater quantity of ICFs economic research that covers a representative sample of ecosystems and fishery types globally. Best practice recommendations are made for a standardised framework to ensure ICFs research generates economically credible and comparable values.

show abstract

“…; Raheem et al . ). Spatially measured economic values are transferrable and comparable, they can aid the mapping of ecosystem services (Fisher et al .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Recommendations For Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current status and future needs of economics research of inland fisheries

Grantham

Rudd

2015

Fisheries Management Eco

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For Europe's seas at least, data on driver, pressure, and state are relatively well developed and readily available at the international level (i.e., through the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES)) and at the centralized European level (i.e., through the European Commission) and to some extent on a regional sea level (e.g., through Baltic Marine Environment Protection CommissionHelsinki Commission (HELCOM)). Critically for the ecosystem approach, reliable spatial information linking environmental state changes to changes in human welfare (ecosystem services data) are in short supply (O'Higgins and Gilbert 2013), a factor recognized internationally as an impediment to ecosystem approach implementation (O'Higgins et al 2010, Jordan et al 2012, Raheem et al 2012). …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A proposed ecosystem-based management system for marine waters: linking the theory of environmental policy to the practice of environmental management

Sardá¹,

O’Higgins²,

Cormier³

et al. 2014

E&S

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…While the valuation methods have been tried and tested for many years, applications using the ES framework fully are relatively recent (TEEB (2010b), Nunes et al 2014. Scientific uncertainty, spatial explicitness and temporal stability of values, definition of affected populations and aggregation over both ES use and non-use values, are important questions also for marine and coastal planning (Luisetti et al 2011;Raheem et al 2012;Sanchirico et al 2013;Marre et al 2015). Figure 1 illustrates the temporal flow of marine and coastal ES, and ES loss/damage due to an external stressor, illustrated in this case by a marine oil spill.…”

Section: Appendix 1 Cices Classification Of Marine Ecosystem Servicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecosystem services in MSP

Ivarsson¹,

Magnussen²,

Heiskanen³

et al. 2017

TemaNord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to describe and communicate a proposal for a new tool for assessing ecosystem services in marine spatial planning in the Nordic countries. The tool is based on a stepwise methodology on how to include ecosystem services assessment in maritime spatial planning processes by providing improved knowledge in all sustainability dimensions; ecological, economic and social desirability. This simple and transparent methodology is also intended to be used in the stakeholder participation, to raise awareness, to create understanding and acceptance, and to help reaching an agreement in the case of conflict regarding the use of marine space.

show abstract

Application of non-market valuation to California's coastal policy decisions

Cited by 25 publications

References 11 publications

Current status and future needs of economics research of inland fisheries

Current status and future needs of economics research of inland fisheries

A proposed ecosystem-based management system for marine waters: linking the theory of environmental policy to the practice of environmental management

Ecosystem services in MSP

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About