2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2019.103261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in coalbed methane and shale reservoirs: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recent development of atomic force microscopy-based infrared spectroscopy (AFM-IR) was also employed to examine the molecular structure of organic matters to provide an insight into the chemical diversities of an inertinite composition (Jubb et al, 2020). Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) as a rapid and nondestructive method to distinguish pore types, and fluid types and states, has been widely applied to calculate the total porosity, estimate organic and inorganic matter porosity, characterize pore size distributions, estimate permeability, and interpret wettability (Gao et al, 2018;Yuan et al, 2018;Liu et al, 2020;Ma et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2021). The fluid invasion approaches including high-pressure mercury intrusion capillary pressure (MICP) testing and low-pressure adsorption (LPA) have often been used to characterize pore structures of shales (Yao et al, 2008;Clarkson et al, 2013;Tian et al, 2013;Afsharpoor and Javadpour, 2018;Sang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent development of atomic force microscopy-based infrared spectroscopy (AFM-IR) was also employed to examine the molecular structure of organic matters to provide an insight into the chemical diversities of an inertinite composition (Jubb et al, 2020). Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) as a rapid and nondestructive method to distinguish pore types, and fluid types and states, has been widely applied to calculate the total porosity, estimate organic and inorganic matter porosity, characterize pore size distributions, estimate permeability, and interpret wettability (Gao et al, 2018;Yuan et al, 2018;Liu et al, 2020;Ma et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2021). The fluid invasion approaches including high-pressure mercury intrusion capillary pressure (MICP) testing and low-pressure adsorption (LPA) have often been used to characterize pore structures of shales (Yao et al, 2008;Clarkson et al, 2013;Tian et al, 2013;Afsharpoor and Javadpour, 2018;Sang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The less accurate moisture estimation mentioned above for the dry coal samples with equal to or less than 12 wt.%H 2 O could be improved by the following advanced methods. (i) The use of the multi-exponential model (Liu et al 2020) instead of the monoexponential model, Eq. (1), would be more promising for the analysis of heterogeneous natural coals having various pore diameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coal is a kind of heterogeneous microporous material with a high surface area, whose pore size spans from as small as less than 1 nm to as large as several hundred nanometers of plant cell pores [34]. The pore surface of coal has a strong adsorption force on gas, and the amount of gas stored in the coal seam depends on the volume and surface area of pores [35,36].…”
Section: Pore Structurementioning
confidence: 99%