2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00178-0_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Ontology Modularization for Building a Criminal Domain Ontology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large ontologies can incorporate concerns from different generality levels ranging from domain-specific concerns (e.g., what kinds of elements are involved in a software service), to concerns that crosscut different domains (e.g., what is a service), to domain-independent ones (e.g., how to differentiate and characterize objects and events). Some approaches (e.g., [15]) use an understanding of ontologies at these different levels (i.e., foundational, core, and domain ontologies) as a strategy for model breakdown. Another example that takes a similar level-based approach for modularizing ontology networks is proposed in [41].…”
Section: Complexity Management Of Conceptual Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Large ontologies can incorporate concerns from different generality levels ranging from domain-specific concerns (e.g., what kinds of elements are involved in a software service), to concerns that crosscut different domains (e.g., what is a service), to domain-independent ones (e.g., how to differentiate and characterize objects and events). Some approaches (e.g., [15]) use an understanding of ontologies at these different levels (i.e., foundational, core, and domain ontologies) as a strategy for model breakdown. Another example that takes a similar level-based approach for modularizing ontology networks is proposed in [41].…”
Section: Complexity Management Of Conceptual Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the aforementioned approaches is fully automated. Approaches such as [14] assume the existence of additional supporting models (enterprise architecture models) and require an understanding of the mapping between these models and the model to be modularized; approaches such as [15] require a human interpretation of the nonconsensual classification of ontologies in different generality levels. Finally, approaches for ontology module extraction and forgetting rely on the user input of seed signatures, which can be a problem in the case of large models.…”
Section: Complexity Management Of Conceptual Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the modular representations are easier to understand, reason with, extend and reuse [24]. Therefore, using these representations tends to reduce the complexity of designing and to facilitate ontology reasoning, development, and integration [13].…”
Section: Modular Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%