2019
DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2019.1589482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Optimum N Through Different Fertilizers Alleviate NH4+-N, NO3N and Total Nitrogen Losses in the Surface Runoff and Leached Water and Improve Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Rice Crop in Erhai Lake Basin, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, after just fertilization, regardless of the fertilization stages, the concentrations of various N and P forms in the surface water of paddy fields were increased compared with CK (Figures 2 and 3), indicating a potential risk of nutrient loss at the beginning of each fertilization stage. Application of suitable fertilizer types, reasonable control of fertilization amount, and improvement of the fertilizer utilization rate of crops are necessary measures to reduce nutrient loss via runoff in paddy fields [25][26][27]. Moreover, as the fertilizers with the largest amount, the rational selection of N−fertilizer types is the key to controlling the N loss via runoff in paddy fields [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, after just fertilization, regardless of the fertilization stages, the concentrations of various N and P forms in the surface water of paddy fields were increased compared with CK (Figures 2 and 3), indicating a potential risk of nutrient loss at the beginning of each fertilization stage. Application of suitable fertilizer types, reasonable control of fertilization amount, and improvement of the fertilizer utilization rate of crops are necessary measures to reduce nutrient loss via runoff in paddy fields [25][26][27]. Moreover, as the fertilizers with the largest amount, the rational selection of N−fertilizer types is the key to controlling the N loss via runoff in paddy fields [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2017) , the NUE in CRU was obviously improved compared with the FP treatment in this study. Also, Husain et al. (2019) found that the CRU treatment (nitrogen fertilizer reduced by 20%) increased grain yield and reduced nitrogen loss from runoff and leaching compared with the FP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Farmers apply excessive amounts of N fertilizers, such as urea, ammonium bicarbonate, and ammonium nitrate, simply following the conventional concept of “the more fertilizer, the higher yield.” However, studies have shown that grain yield does not increase accordingly with the excess of applied N ( Ju et al, 2009 ; Cui et al, 2010 ; Liu et al, 2016 ). Indeed, although large amounts of N fertilizer are regularly applied as base fertilizer to increase the NH 4 + -N concentration and, thus, change the ratio of NH 4 + and NO 3 – in the soil ( Husain et al, 2019 ; Kirschke et al, 2019 ; Wang et al, 2020 ), a high-NH 4 + concentration may be a disadvantage for plant growth. Wheat was shown to have a specific preference for NO 3 – , and in fact, showed toxicity symptoms under high NH 4 + concentration ( Imran et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies have shown that grain yield does not increase accordingly with the excess of applied N (Ju et al, 2009;Cui et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2016). Indeed, although large amounts of N fertilizer are regularly applied as base fertilizer to increase the NH 4 + -N concentration and, thus, change the ratio of NH 4 + and NO 3 − in the soil (Husain et al, 2019;Kirschke et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2020), a high-NH 4…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%