Application of physiologically based modelling and transcriptomics to probe the systems toxicology of aldicarb for Caenorhabditis elegans (Maupas 1900)

Abstract

The toxicity of aldicarb on movement, life cycle, population growth rate and resource allocation, and the gene expression changes underpinning these effects, were investigated for Caenorhabditis elegans. A clear effect of aldicarb on nematode movement was found suggesting that this pesticide acts as a neurotoxicant. Aldicarb also had an effect on life cycle traits including low concentration life-span extension; high concentration brood size reduction and a high concentration extension of time to first egg. All life-cycle and growth data were integrated into a biology-based model (DEBtox) to characterise aldicarb effects on life-history traits, resource allocation and population growth rate within a single modelling framework. The DEBtox fits described concentration dependent effects on individual traits and population growth rate and indicated that the most probable mechanism of action of the pesticide was an increase in energy demands for somatic and reproductive tissue maintenance. Transcriptomic profiling indicated that aldicarb was associated with changes in amino acid metabolism, DNA structure, fatty acid metabolism and cytochrome P450 mediated xenobiotic metabolism. The changes in the amino acid and fatty acid pathways suggest an effect of aldicarb on protein integrity; while effects on DNA suggests that aldicarb influence DNA morphology or replication. Both these effects have the potential to incur increased costs for structural maintenance of macromolecules. These effects, coupled to the effect on biotransformation enzymes also seen, represent the materialisation of the maintenance costs indicated by DEBtox modelling.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10646-010-0591-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Toxicity in relation to mode of action for the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: Acute-to-chronic ratios and quantitative structure–activity relationships

“…Since the 1970s, C. elegans has been used frequently for single‐species toxicity testing to evaluate effects by various substances, with mortality, behavior, reproduction, and growth as the endpoints most often applied . In general, both the range of EC50s and LC50s and the relative toxicity ranking of substances (within groups) obtained in the present study were similar to those previously reported for C. elegans , although test conditions differed in several points (e.g., tested life stage, exposure times) . Irrespective of the endpoint used, metals and carbamates possessed a comparable toxic potential and were both by far more toxic than nonpolar narcotics.…”

Toxicity-based toxicokinetic/toxicodynamic assessment of bioaccumulation and nanotoxicity of zerovalent iron nanoparticles in <em>Caenorhabditis elegans</em>

“…Mechanisms of action of aldicarb have been investigated using DEBtox modeling, revealing that an increase in energy demands was associated with maintenance in somatic and reproductive tissues. 81 It was found that uranium affected assimilation of energy from food and disrupted growth and reproduction in C. elegans based on the DEBtox model. 75 Taken together, although there are plausible uncertainties in the experiments and the modeling, our toxicity bioassays and the TBTK/TD modeling in worms could be extensively applied in environmental and health-risk analysis.…”

Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model in Developmental Toxicology

“…Toxicity endpoints recently reported include reproduction (11), feeding (12), DNA damage and repair (13, 14), and gene expression (15, 16). Despite the advantages of C. elegans as a model of development and disease, its use in developmental toxicology has largely focused on observational rather than mechanistic studies (17).…”