2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2011.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of principal component and hierarchical cluster analysis to classify different spices based on in vitro antioxidant activity and individual polyphenolic antioxidant compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
66
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The ORAC values of Plantago lanceolata leaf were higher than those of rosehip (1085 ± 24.32 lmol TE/ gDW), cinnamon (1069 ± 5.47 lmol TE/gDW), oregano (1233 ± 41.36 lmol TE/gDW) and nutmeg (1187 ± 8.74 lmol TE/ gDW) -herbs known for their high antioxidant capacities and health benefits (Su et al, 2007). The ORAC value of Plantago lanceolata leaf was approximately double to that of basil (702 ± 4 lmol TE/gDW), thyme (825 ± 2.8 lmol TE/gDW) and 3-fold that of parsley (529.38 ± 4.8 lmol TE/gDW), while the ORAC value of Plantago lanceolata flower was similar to ORAC values of rosemary (1074 ± 8 lmol TE/gDW), marjoram (1013.22 ± 4 lmol TE/gDW) and well known for its antiinflammatory properties, sage (1032 ± 4.4 lmol TE/gDW) (Hossain et al, 2011). The radical scavenging abilities of root, stem and fruit of Malva neglecta were similar to those of celery (419.51 ± 6 lmol TE/gDW) and parsley (529.38 ± 4.8 lmol TE/gDW) (Hossain et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ORAC values of Plantago lanceolata leaf were higher than those of rosehip (1085 ± 24.32 lmol TE/ gDW), cinnamon (1069 ± 5.47 lmol TE/gDW), oregano (1233 ± 41.36 lmol TE/gDW) and nutmeg (1187 ± 8.74 lmol TE/ gDW) -herbs known for their high antioxidant capacities and health benefits (Su et al, 2007). The ORAC value of Plantago lanceolata leaf was approximately double to that of basil (702 ± 4 lmol TE/gDW), thyme (825 ± 2.8 lmol TE/gDW) and 3-fold that of parsley (529.38 ± 4.8 lmol TE/gDW), while the ORAC value of Plantago lanceolata flower was similar to ORAC values of rosemary (1074 ± 8 lmol TE/gDW), marjoram (1013.22 ± 4 lmol TE/gDW) and well known for its antiinflammatory properties, sage (1032 ± 4.4 lmol TE/gDW) (Hossain et al, 2011). The radical scavenging abilities of root, stem and fruit of Malva neglecta were similar to those of celery (419.51 ± 6 lmol TE/gDW) and parsley (529.38 ± 4.8 lmol TE/gDW) (Hossain et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The ORAC value of Plantago lanceolata leaf was approximately double to that of basil (702 ± 4 lmol TE/gDW), thyme (825 ± 2.8 lmol TE/gDW) and 3-fold that of parsley (529.38 ± 4.8 lmol TE/gDW), while the ORAC value of Plantago lanceolata flower was similar to ORAC values of rosemary (1074 ± 8 lmol TE/gDW), marjoram (1013.22 ± 4 lmol TE/gDW) and well known for its antiinflammatory properties, sage (1032 ± 4.4 lmol TE/gDW) (Hossain et al, 2011). The radical scavenging abilities of root, stem and fruit of Malva neglecta were similar to those of celery (419.51 ± 6 lmol TE/gDW) and parsley (529.38 ± 4.8 lmol TE/gDW) (Hossain et al, 2011). Flower and leaf of Malva neglecta had similar ORAC values or higher than basil (702 ± 4 lmol TE/gDW) and thyme (825 ± 2.8 lmol TE/ gDW) (Hossain et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The cumulative explained variance for each additional PC is shown in Figure 1(C). According to Hossain et al (2011), PC1 is more generally correlated with the variables than is PC2 because the PCs are extracted successively, each one accounting for as much of the remaining variance as possible. In Figure 1(A), the positions of the PCs as discrete variables are shown by a simple scatter plot, and in Figure 1(B), they are arranged as continuous variables.…”
Section: Exploratory Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential antioxidant effect of herbs, or that of isolated phenolic compounds, has been extensively determined by in vitro tests. Common methods for measuring the antioxidant capacity include free radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging, OH radical scavenging ability, reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP), oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), and Trolox equivalence antioxidant capacity (TEAC), among others (Hossain, Patras, Barry-Ryan, Martin-Diana, & Brunton, 2011;Jabri-Karoui, Bettaieb, Msaada, Hammami, & Marzouk, 2012). Despite their usefulness, these assays have some limitations, the most important being the difficulty of extrapolating results to the in vivo conditions, whereas closer results can be obtained by the use of cultured cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%