2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00861-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
285
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 633 publications
(305 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
14
285
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Jika dibandingkan dengan nilai yang diprediksikan (Tabel 7), maka nilai hasil verifikasi berada di kisaran 95% PI low dan 95% PI high. Hal ini berarti kondisi proses pengolahan untuk memperoleh ATC dengan rendemen dan kekuatan gel yang maksimum, cukup konsisten (Noordin et al, 2004).…”
Section: Verifikasi Solusi Formula Optimumunclassified
“…Jika dibandingkan dengan nilai yang diprediksikan (Tabel 7), maka nilai hasil verifikasi berada di kisaran 95% PI low dan 95% PI high. Hal ini berarti kondisi proses pengolahan untuk memperoleh ATC dengan rendemen dan kekuatan gel yang maksimum, cukup konsisten (Noordin et al, 2004).…”
Section: Verifikasi Solusi Formula Optimumunclassified
“…In contrast, statistical experimental design using response surface methodology (RSM) [14] can optimize all the effecting parameters and thus eliminate the limitations of a single factor optimising. The RSM has been widely used in various fields such as in biochemistry [15,16], in material processing for describing the performance of coated carbide tools [17], and in water treatment for studying the optimization of the coagulation-flocculation process [18]. However, few studies were reported to optimize influencing factors and their interactions to improve FA removal efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlation coefficient needs to be at a minimum of 0.80 for a good fit of model (Abu Amr et al 2014). A high R 2 value (closer to 1) demonstrates good accordance between the calculated and observed results within the range of experiment and shows that a desirable and reasonable agreement with adjusted R 2 is necessary (Nordin et al 2004;Abu Amr et al 2014). The range in predicted response relative to its associated error can be measured by adequate precision.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%