2017 Baltic Geodetic Congress (BGC Geomatics) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/bgc.geomatics.2017.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Robust Estimation Methods to Displacements Determination in Geodetic Control Network of Dam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past, many di erent robust methods have been used in Geodesy. For example, the Least Absolute Deviations method (Yetkin and Inal 2011), M-estimators (Banaś, 2017), and high-breakdown estimators, i.e., LMS (Least Median of Squares) and LTS (Least Trimmed Squares) methods (Yetkin and Berber, 2014) have been applied successfully.…”
Section: Robust Ltav Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, many di erent robust methods have been used in Geodesy. For example, the Least Absolute Deviations method (Yetkin and Inal 2011), M-estimators (Banaś, 2017), and high-breakdown estimators, i.e., LMS (Least Median of Squares) and LTS (Least Trimmed Squares) methods (Yetkin and Berber, 2014) have been applied successfully.…”
Section: Robust Ltav Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Za izračun Huberjeve ocene lahko uporabimo za c  1,3450 (Pennacchi, 2008;Banaś, 2017;Pardoe et al, 2018), drugi avtorji (Nowel, 2015;Gašinec in Gašincová, 2016;Hassan, 2016;Sušić et al, 2017;Erenoglu, 2018) pa predlagajo vrednosti za c med 1,5 in 2.…”
Section: Utežna Funkcijaunclassified
“…Po testiranju stabilnosti posamezne komponente z German-McClurejevo oceno za komponente vektorja premika točke po enačbah v preglednici 1 se za točki 5 in 6 rezultat ne ujema glede s simuliranim stanjem. Če uporabimo različne konstante (Erenoglu, 2018;Banaś, 2017;Labant et al, 2011) v Hampelovi oceni za komponente vektorja premika točke po enačbi v preglednici 1, dobimo precej podobne rezultate -izračunane komponente premikov se razlikujejo za največ 3,6 mm, izračunani premiki pa 2,5 mm. Potrjena je stabilnost točk 4, 5 in 6 ter nestabilnost točk 1, 2, 3 in 7.…”
Section: Komentar Rezultatov -Premiki Točk Po Koordinatnih Komponentahunclassified