Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning (ISATP'99) (Cat. No.99TH8470)
DOI: 10.1109/isatp.1999.782938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of screw theory to motion analysis of assemblies of rigid parts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A user can combine members of this set to join two parts, and then determine whether or not the defined feature set over-, under-, or fully-constrains the location and orientation of the part. Motion limit analysis [74] uses the mathematics of screw theory to model the ability of assembly features to allow or constrain rigid body motions in six DOF. The directions and quantitative amounts of possible finite rigid body motions of a part that is being added to an assembly can be determined via calculation applied to a defined set of assembly features.…”
Section: Screw Theory Basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A user can combine members of this set to join two parts, and then determine whether or not the defined feature set over-, under-, or fully-constrains the location and orientation of the part. Motion limit analysis [74] uses the mathematics of screw theory to model the ability of assembly features to allow or constrain rigid body motions in six DOF. The directions and quantitative amounts of possible finite rigid body motions of a part that is being added to an assembly can be determined via calculation applied to a defined set of assembly features.…”
Section: Screw Theory Basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waldron [22] utilized the Screw Theory to build a general method to determine all relative degrees of freedom (DOF) between two rigid bodies making contacts to each other. Extending the work by Konkar and Cutkosky [23], Adams and Whitney [24,25] developed a method to determine the status (over-, under-or fully constrained) of rigid body assemblies with mating features. Their method also determines the motion type and range of under-constrained rigid body assemblies.…”
Section: Screw Theory In Motion and Constraint Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Konkar and Cutkosky [14] created screw system representations of assembly mating features. Adams et al [15][16][17] used Konkar's algorithm and extended their work by defining extensible screw representations of some types of assembly features. Gerbino et al [18,19] proposed an algorithm to decompose the liaison diagram representing an assembly into simple paths, to which the application of the twist union or intersection algorithms may be easily applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is time consuming when the machine is large and complex. On the other hand, to determine the screw system by using the methods proposed in [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], all of the screw representations of different features that may be used first have to be modeled. This is awkward and resembles geometric reasoning [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%