2007
DOI: 10.1080/19315775.2007.11721398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Simulation Software to Coordinate Measurement Uncertainty Evaluations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…., β n ), and ε means the error terms. e weights have to be chosen to minimize the sum of squared differences between the actual and the predicted output values as in equation (2). e primary benefit of a linear model is its competence to interpret the significance of variables through coefficients as weights.…”
Section: Overview Of Practiced Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…., β n ), and ε means the error terms. e weights have to be chosen to minimize the sum of squared differences between the actual and the predicted output values as in equation (2). e primary benefit of a linear model is its competence to interpret the significance of variables through coefficients as weights.…”
Section: Overview Of Practiced Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kendall's concordance coefficient (W) [97,98] can be estimated to quantify the degree of ranking consensus between different ranking methods. W ranges from 0 to 1, with 1 implying the ideal compliance between the outcomes from various methods: 2 , r ij � rating optimization method i gives to combination j, m � optimization methods, and k � number of combinations.…”
Section: Depending On Specifications the Weighted Normalized Decision Matrix Assigns Significance To Individual Responses (Or Aspects) Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 Meanwhile, the rise in complex part designs and the growing demands of tighter tolerances have led to the requirements of an established and an effective plan for inspection process on CMMs. According to previous studies, 68 there can be many factors as shown in Figure 1, which contribute to the measurement uncertainty of CMM results. These factors include sampling strategy, workpiece position and orientation, surface conditions, sensor type and configuration, and environment conditions.…”
Section: Sampling Strategy and Its Purposementioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, CMM measurements are accompanied with unlimited sources of variability such as workpiece position and orientation, sensor type and configuration, environment conditions, sampling strategy, computational strategy, etc. [2]. Actually, measurement with CMM is a multi-step process where each stage as shown in Figure 1 contributes to overall measurement uncertainty.…”
Section: Measurement Uncertainties Associated With Cmmmentioning
confidence: 99%