Most of the techniques developed so far for module performance analysis rely on steady-state measurements from a single operating point to evaluate the level of deterioration of an engine. One of the major difficulties associated with this estimation problem comes from its underdetermined nature. It results from the fact that the number of health parameters exceeds the number of available sensors. Among the panel of remedies to this issue, a few authors have investigated the potential of using data collected during a transient operation of the engine. A major outcome of these studies is an improvement in the assessed health condition.The present contribution proposes a framework that formalises this observation for a given class of input signals. The analysis is performed in the frequency domain, following the lines of system identification theory. More specifically, the meansquared estimation error is shown to drastically decrease when using transient input signals. The study is conducted with an engine model representative of a commercial turbofan. Keywords: Gas path analysis, frequency domain, least-squares, system identification. N (m,C) the Gaussian probability density function with mean m and covariance matrix C
NOMENCLATURE
E(·)
INTRODUCTIONPredictive maintenance aims at scheduling overhaul actions on the basis of the actual level of deterioration of the engine. The benefits are improved dispatch reliability and safety as well as reduced life cycle costs. Generating reliable information about the health condition of the gas turbine is therefore a requisite and has been the subject of intensive research in the community.In this paper, Module Performance Analysis is considered. Its purpose is to detect, isolate and quantify the changes in engine module performance, described by so-called health parameters, on the basis of measurements collected along the gas path of the engine [1]. Typically, the health parameters are correcting factors on the efficiency and flow capacity of the modules (fan, LPC, HPC, HPT, LPT) while the measurements are intercomponent temperatures, pressures, shaft speeds and fuel flow. Since the pioneering work by Urban [2], most of the literature on module performance analysis has considered the processing of data observed during steady-state operation of the engine.In this framework, the estimation of the health parameters can be cast as an optimisation problem which is characterised by a number of difficulties. The underlying process is non-linear, engine measurements are subject to noise and bias and the introduction of model inaccuracy is inevitable. Moreover, the number of sensors is usually smaller than the number of health parameters, making the problem underdetermined.One obvious way to tackle this non-uniqueness in the solution would be to complement the sensor set installed on the engine, but significant additional costs would be incurred. Hence, this solution on the hardware side is disregarded by engine manufacturers. Two roads of remedy on the software side have the...