1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf02513668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the group substoichiometric separation of gold, mercuric, and cupric diethyldithiocarbamates to determining them by means of activation analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was confirmed that no evidence of the formation of chloride-mixed metal diethyldithiocarbamate for either copper or zinc was found. Extraction constants for these two ions were reported by several authors and the best values of ACu(ddo2 = 1026 8 and /fzn(DDC)2 = 10159 (9,13, [25][26][27] were used in this work for the evaluation of other extraction constants by Equation 12.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was confirmed that no evidence of the formation of chloride-mixed metal diethyldithiocarbamate for either copper or zinc was found. Extraction constants for these two ions were reported by several authors and the best values of ACu(ddo2 = 1026 8 and /fzn(DDC)2 = 10159 (9,13, [25][26][27] were used in this work for the evaluation of other extraction constants by Equation 12.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mercury(II) back-extraction process can be expressed by the following equation: where DTC denotes dithiocarbamate and subscript org represents organic phase. Thermodynamically, eq 1 should be favored to the right because of the large equilibrium constant According to previous reports, KHg(DTC)2 is in the oder of 1040 which is much greater than the K values of the eight metals included in this study (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). For example, the extraction constant of Cu is only in the order of 1027, the highest among the eight metals investigated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In a second review, these authors discussed methods published during the period 1968 to 1970 (2). Since this review, several additional solvent extraction methods have been reported (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). A general discussion of substoichiometric methods for multielemental separation by metal chelate extractions (17), a report on the selectivity of substoichiometric extraction methods (18), and a general review of the substoichiometric approach in analysis have also been published (19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%