Application of the Law of Self-Determination in a Postcolonial Context: A Guideline

Kadir, M. Ya’kub Aiyub

doi:10.14330/jeail.2016.9.1.01

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Secara historis Aceh dianggap sebagai kerajaan Islam pertama yang berdaulat di Asia Tenggara (Perlak dan Pasai), yang pernah mencapai kejayaannya di bawah Sultan Iskandar Muda (1607-1636). Namun kegagalan armada Aceh merebut kembali kerajaan Malaka dari Portugis merupakan awal kegagalan besar bagi Aceh untuk meningkatkan daya tawar politik dengan kekuatan kolonial (Siegel, 2000 (Kadir, 2016).…”

Section: Perjalanan Aceh Dalam Sejarahunclassified

Policy and Practice: Refleksi Perjanjian Damai Helsinki 2005-2018: Kesuksesan Dan Tantangan Kedepan

Kadir

2019

JHSJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper is a reflection of the peace agreement between the Free Aceh Movement and the Government of Indonesia from 2005 to 2018. There have been improvement after a decade but there are still challenges that must be realized. The Helsinki Memorandum of Understanding (known as Helsinky peace agreement) on 15 August 2005 resulted a consensus that Aceh could have greater rights than before, as stipulated in the Law on Governing Aceh number 11/2006. Thus, Aceh has more authorities to redefine the political, economic, social and cultural status in the Republic of Indonesia system. This paper attempts to analyze this problem through a historical description of the movement of the Acehnese people, in the hope of contributing to increasing understanding of the concept of the Helsinki peace agreement in the context of sustainable peace and welfare improvement for the people of Aceh

show abstract

Section: Perjalanan Aceh Dalam Sejarahunclassified

Policy and Practice: Refleksi Perjanjian Damai Helsinki 2005-2018: Kesuksesan Dan Tantangan Kedepan

Kadir

2019

JHSJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Resource Nationalism in the Law and Policies of Indonesia: A Contest of State, Foreign Investors, and Indigenous Peoples

Kadir¹,

Murray²

2019

AsianJIL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper examines resource nationalism in the legal system of Indonesia under the interpretation of Articles 33(2), 33(3), and 18B(2) of the 1945 Constitution. It will describe the evolution of the meaning of resource nationalism since independence to the present day, in the context of foreign investment, to investigate the extent to which resource nationalism has benefited indigenous peoples. This paper argues that resource nationalism in the legal system of Indonesia has been driven by state-centric goals and has strayed far away from considerations of the benefits to the indigenous people (Masyarakat Hukum Adat/MHA), so as to dominantly benefit the elites of government and foreign investors. This paper will introduce a new conceptual framework in order to develop an effective argument about resource nationalism using International Human Rights Law.

show abstract

Secession in Africa: An African Union dilemma

Ekeke¹,

Lubisi²

2019

African Security Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Application of the Law of Self-Determination in a Postcolonial Context: A Guideline

Abstract: The development of the law of self-determination has been stagnant in terms of

Cited by 5 publications

References 3 publications

Policy and Practice: Refleksi Perjanjian Damai Helsinki 2005-2018: Kesuksesan Dan Tantangan Kedepan

Policy and Practice: Refleksi Perjanjian Damai Helsinki 2005-2018: Kesuksesan Dan Tantangan Kedepan

Resource Nationalism in the Law and Policies of Indonesia: A Contest of State, Foreign Investors, and Indigenous Peoples

Secession in Africa: An African Union dilemma

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About