2000
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2000.6610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the Space–Time Conservation Element and Solution Element Method to One-Dimensional Convection–Diffusion Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, the CESE based solvers have been utilized to solve a variety of problems including inviscid acoustic waves, traveling and interacting shocks, detonation waves, and cavitation flows. [17][18][19][20][21] The main objective of this study is to perform numerical computations for selected experimental configurations studied by Daso et al 16 Axisymmetric computations are carried out to study the underlying physics associated with the two modes of jet interaction. Results are compared against available experimental data, such as Schlieren images, and other details available in literature.…”
Section: Background and Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the CESE based solvers have been utilized to solve a variety of problems including inviscid acoustic waves, traveling and interacting shocks, detonation waves, and cavitation flows. [17][18][19][20][21] The main objective of this study is to perform numerical computations for selected experimental configurations studied by Daso et al 16 Axisymmetric computations are carried out to study the underlying physics associated with the two modes of jet interaction. Results are compared against available experimental data, such as Schlieren images, and other details available in literature.…”
Section: Background and Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this scheme, (ut)j is evaluated using a finite-difference/weighted-average procedure which involves a parameter a (see Eqs. (2.62), (2.63 ) and (2.65) in [12]). The key disadvantage of the a-a scheme and its extensions (see below) is that, compared with the more general CE/SE schemes, they allow for less freedom in adjusting numerical dissipation.…”
Section: The Ce/se Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The Space-Time Conservation Element and Solution Element (CEjSE) Method, originally proposed by Chang [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], is a new numerical framework for solving conservation laws. The CE/SE m ethod is not an incremental improvement of a previously existing CFD m ethod , and it differs substantially from other well-established methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally developed by Chang and coworkers, the CESE method [8][9][10][11][12] is a new numerical framework for conservation laws. The CESE method employs a unified treatment for space and time to enforce local and global space-time flux conservation, which differs substantially from conventional CFD methods.…”
Section: The Cese Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%