Ground Improvement Case Histories 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100192-9.00004-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the Vacuum Preloading Method in Soil Improvement Projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the depth increase, the vacuum pressure decreased, its losses observed for the depth from 0 to 0.6 m in both T1 and T2 amounted to approximately 20 kPa/m, which was consistent with the results obtained by Cai et al [22]. e depth in T1 spanning from 0.6 to 1.2 m exhibited even greater attenuation, indicating that it was impossible to achieve uniformly distributed vacuum pressure along the vertical direction in the improved soil under vacuum preloading [23,24]. e signi cant di erences between T1 and T2 included the times required to reach measurable vacuum pressure levels within the subsoil and those passed until steady pressures value were attained.…”
Section: Testing Procedure Testing Was Performed As Followssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…With the depth increase, the vacuum pressure decreased, its losses observed for the depth from 0 to 0.6 m in both T1 and T2 amounted to approximately 20 kPa/m, which was consistent with the results obtained by Cai et al [22]. e depth in T1 spanning from 0.6 to 1.2 m exhibited even greater attenuation, indicating that it was impossible to achieve uniformly distributed vacuum pressure along the vertical direction in the improved soil under vacuum preloading [23,24]. e signi cant di erences between T1 and T2 included the times required to reach measurable vacuum pressure levels within the subsoil and those passed until steady pressures value were attained.…”
Section: Testing Procedure Testing Was Performed As Followssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As illustrated by Chu and Yan (2005) with the spring analogy shown in Fig. 1.1, the mechanism of the vacuum preloading is decreasing the pore pressure, rather than increasing the total stress.…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Vacuum Preloadingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This approach has been successfully used in numerous soil improvement projects across the world (Bergado et al 2002;Chu et al 2004;Chu and Yan 2005;Chu et al 2000;Holtan 1965;Seah 2006. The mechanism of vacuum preloading have been discussed extensively by many investigators, i.e., Kjellman (1952), Holtz and Wager (1975), Qian et al (1992) and Chu and Yan (2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%