“…High levels of selectivity and specificity of mass spectrometry (MS), typically coupled to liquid chromatography (LC), render it an analytical technique of choice to provide the required accuracy needed in deducing the DAR values. ,,, The currently employed MS methods differ by the resolution performance (low vs high resolution) and the degree of protein unfolding (denaturing vs native MS conditions). ,,− The native MS approach has been shown to have advantages for the analysis of both noncovalently and covalently bound ADC samples compared to analysis performed under denaturing conditions. ,,, Lower-resolution levels, ∼5000–15,000 at the target m / z peak, are common for mass measurements of proteins in the native MS approach. ,,− Analysis of ADCs/AOCs of a low-to-medium sample complexity could be efficiently conducted with Orbitrap Fourier transform MS (FTMS), ,,− time-of-flight (TOF) MS, ,,, and triple quadrupole MS platforms . The increased complexity of ADC samples has paved the way to a broader application of high-resolution MS instruments, , which may still prove to be inadequate at resolving highly congested mass spectra derived from complex ADC/AOC samples.…”