In Situ-Produced Cosmogenic Nuclides and Quantification of Geological Processes 2006
DOI: 10.1130/2006.2415(05)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of morphochronology to the active tectonics of Tibet

Abstract: Abstract. The Himalayas and the Tibetan Plateau were formed as a result of the collision of India and Asia, and provide an excellent opportunity to study the mechanical response of the continental lithosphere to tectonic stress. Geophysicists are divided in their views on the nature of this response advocating either (1) homogeneously distributed deformation with the lithosphere deforming as a fluid continuum or (2) deformation is highly localized with the lithosphere that deforms as a system of blocks. The re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(178 reference statements)
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each sample, the minimum and the maximum ages (calculated assuming no erosion and maximum erosion, respectively) are given in Table 1. For ages in the order of 70 ka, maximum erosion would lead to a 15% increase of the age, which is barely larger than the uncertainty, confirming the zero‐erosion hypothesis for surfaces F3 and younger [e.g., Ryerson et al , 2006]. The maximum erosion rate would imply very poor age control for surfaces older than F4.…”
Section: Surface Exposure Dating Of the Abandoned Alluvial Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For each sample, the minimum and the maximum ages (calculated assuming no erosion and maximum erosion, respectively) are given in Table 1. For ages in the order of 70 ka, maximum erosion would lead to a 15% increase of the age, which is barely larger than the uncertainty, confirming the zero‐erosion hypothesis for surfaces F3 and younger [e.g., Ryerson et al , 2006]. The maximum erosion rate would imply very poor age control for surfaces older than F4.…”
Section: Surface Exposure Dating Of the Abandoned Alluvial Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The latter is younger than the youngest surface sample. Since the age of the surface cannot be older than the youngest sample at depth [ Ryerson et al , 2006], a mean inheritance of about 1.3 ka might be inferred (mean of the surface sample ages minus age of the youngest depth sample). A minimum inheritance of ∼820 years may similarly be derived from the difference between the ages of the youngest sample at depth and at the surface, assuming no inheritance on the depth sample.…”
Section: Cosmogenic Radionuclide Dating Of the Fluvial Terracesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulator yields a most likely minimum and maximum values of 1.5 ka and 3.5 ka, respectively, with a lowest Chi‐square for 2.4 ka (Figure Sup 5). Clearly however, two depth samples are insufficient to reliably estimate inheritance, especially in view of the variability of the inheritance inherent to the single cobble sampling strategy [ Ryerson et al , 2006] and the errors built in CRN model ages at depth, which imply knowledge of the density of the stratum above the sample and of the attenuation of the cosmic ray flux whose estimates vary from ∼140 to ∼180 g/cm 2 [ Gosse and Phillips , 2001]. Here, we used 177 ± 4 g/cm 2 [ Farber et al , 2008] for the attenuation length and 2.2 ± 0.2 g/cm 3 for the overburden density to calculate the two depth‐sample model ages and to run the Monte Carlo simulations [ Hidy et al , 2010].…”
Section: Cosmogenic Radionuclide Dating Of the Fluvial Terracesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this context, interplate fault slip rates are usually considered as constant due to steady plate boundary loading rates. However, on individual fault systems, comparisons of geological and geodetic fault slip rates suggest that they may have varied over long-spanned time scales (Grant and Sieh, 1994;Stein et al, 1997;Bendick et al, 2000;Dawson et al, 2003;Dixon et al, 2002;Friedrich et al, 2003;Ryerson et al, 2006). Measurements and comparison of fault slip rates integrated over different time spans are thus important not only to apprehend how plate convergence is accommodated by continental lithospheres but also to determine to what extend the slip rate variations may be related to the fault strength or to the transient accumulation of elastic strain in the lithosphere (e.g., Fay and Humphreys, 2005;Oskin et al, 2007;Chuang and Johnson, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%