Practical Residual Stress Measurement Methods 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781118402832.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applied and Residual Stress Determination Using X‐ray Diffraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7). Several of the measured surfaces exhibit this relationship, which is indicative of significant shear stresses in addition to the 11 and 22 uniaxial stresses in the sample surface [18,20].…”
Section: Results -Residual Stressesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7). Several of the measured surfaces exhibit this relationship, which is indicative of significant shear stresses in addition to the 11 and 22 uniaxial stresses in the sample surface [18,20].…”
Section: Results -Residual Stressesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XRD provides an average (bulk) analysis of the interplanar spacing (d-spacing) for crystalline materials for the volume of material with which the X-rays interact. When a material experiences residual lattice strain, the d-spacing is altered [18]. For residual stress measurement, greater accuracy can be achieved from d-spacing calculated from high angle peaks, and the recommended peak for Ti 6Al-4V is the [213] peak at ~141.7 o [19].…”
Section: Characterization By Xrdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surface macroscopic residual stresses were described using X-ray diffraction and the X'Pert PRO MPD diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical B.V., Almelo, The Netherlands) with chromium radiation. The values of surface macroscopic residual stresses were calculated from the lattice deformations, which were determined based on experimental dependencies of 2θ (sin 2 ψ) assuming a bi-axial state of residual stress without gradients in the normal direction, where θ is the diffraction angle, ψ the angle between the sample surface and the diffracting lattice planes [26]. The diffraction angle was determined as the centre of gravity of the CrKα 1 α 2 doublet diffracted by the {211} crystallographic lattice planes of the α-Fe phase.…”
Section: Residual Stresses Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The destructive techniques imply the complete or partial destruction of structural members in order to perform the measurements (e.g., the hole drilling and ring coring techniques [ 5 7 ], the slitting and contour methods [ 8 10 ], etc.). On the other hand, the non-destructive methods (e.g., the X-ray and neutron diffraction [ 11 13 ], the magnetic, ultrasonic, and optical methods [ 14 16 ], etc.) allow for saving the structural integrity but have limited applicability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%