2013
DOI: 10.4324/9780203102411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applied Health Economics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
78
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
78
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Cost analyses were performed with robust SEs to account for possible overdispersion. 18 Significance tests were 2 tailed. Statistical significance was assumed for P values <0.05 for all tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cost analyses were performed with robust SEs to account for possible overdispersion. 18 Significance tests were 2 tailed. Statistical significance was assumed for P values <0.05 for all tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second part was used to analyze the level of total costs for patients who were hospitalized and was constructed via a generalized linear model with a γ-distribution and identity link function. 18 The 2 parts of the model were combined to estimate the marginal effect of therapy resumption on the predicted, mean, discounted, 3-year hospitalization cost per patient as given by the partial derivatives of the marginal expectation 17,18 :…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The expected inverted L-shape of the empirical distribution function is found in our sample (Tubeuf and Perronnin, 2008;Jones et al, 2013). This shape reflects that there is a long lefthand tail which represents relatively few individuals in very bad health and many people concentrated in the right-hand tail.…”
Section: Selfmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Moreover, Beatty et al (2010) estimate an endogenous switching regression model using withinestablishment means in the selection and the regime equations to exploit the panel structure of their data. Finally, the Mundlak approach or the related Chamberlain-Mundlak approach, controlling for correlated fixed effects, has recently been used, e.g., in Jones et al (2007), Abdulai and Tietje (2007), and Fitzenberger et al (2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%