2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2011.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying an ontology approach to IT service management for business-IT integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same holds true for ontologies used for business modelling, system configuration and execution management systems, as presented by Cai et al 2016), as well as for typologies in the context of business process management (BPM), as introduced by Müller et al (2016). On the one hand, this also applies for ontologies in the context of ITSM (Freitas, Correia, and E Abreu 2008;Valiente, Garcia-Barriocanal, and Sicilia 2012), IT governance frameworks in the context of the Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) (Office 2011) and for related ontologies, such as the GoodRelations ontology (Hepp 2008) or the Financial Industry Business Ontology (FIBO) (Council 2016). On the other hand, ontologies such as the Business Model Ontology (BMO) (Osterwald, Pigneur, and Tucci 2005) and the e3-value ontology (Gordijn and Akkermans 2001) only focus on the conceptualization of economic aspects within a single enterprise or economic aspects within a network of enterprises.…”
Section: The Domain Of It Benchmarkingmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The same holds true for ontologies used for business modelling, system configuration and execution management systems, as presented by Cai et al 2016), as well as for typologies in the context of business process management (BPM), as introduced by Müller et al (2016). On the one hand, this also applies for ontologies in the context of ITSM (Freitas, Correia, and E Abreu 2008;Valiente, Garcia-Barriocanal, and Sicilia 2012), IT governance frameworks in the context of the Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) (Office 2011) and for related ontologies, such as the GoodRelations ontology (Hepp 2008) or the Financial Industry Business Ontology (FIBO) (Council 2016). On the other hand, ontologies such as the Business Model Ontology (BMO) (Osterwald, Pigneur, and Tucci 2005) and the e3-value ontology (Gordijn and Akkermans 2001) only focus on the conceptualization of economic aspects within a single enterprise or economic aspects within a network of enterprises.…”
Section: The Domain Of It Benchmarkingmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…ITIL [5] directs maintenance management process; Log collection and analysis is for intrusion detect and system monitoring [4]; equipment monitoring and faults are for receiving hardware equipment information [6]; decentralized process of maintenance management is integrated [7]; Fault information statistical analysis and optimization of maintenance work is by data mining and semantic analysis technology [8,9],and so on. Some large enterprises, developed maintenance systems or customized solutions by themselves ,such as telecoms, electric power companies, financial companies, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontology mapping is a relatively mature area of research used for aligning two or more ontologies (information sources) for the purpose of sharing information and overcoming heterogeneity issues [1,2,[4][5][6][7][8]. The terms mapping and matching are often used interchangeably.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matching is the process of determining semantic relatedness between two entities. On the other hand, mapping is the process of finding the data transformation based on the semantic relatedness for a given instance of a source entity that will produce an instance of a target entity [8,9]. Falcon [2], MAFRA [5], H-Match [6], Lily [10], and TaxoMap [11] are amongst the best matching and mapping systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%