Time efficient reconciliation of mappings in dynamic web ontologies

Identifying relevant concept attributes to support mapping maintenance under ontology evolution

“…In addition, if large ontologies are frequently released, fully re-calculating mappings becomes less flexible than a partial re-calculation approach because the cost in terms of processing time for re-aligning ontologies still remains too expensive. Khattak et al [24] propose a partial recalculation approach, which re-creates only those mappings associated with concepts whose elements have changed. They use matching algorithms to perform a new alignment between changed concepts issued from source ontology and the whole target ontology.…”

Semi-automatic Adaptation of Mappings between Life Science Ontologies

“…In [22] the use of reasoners has been proposed for detecting and repairing invalid correspondences after ontology changes. Khattak et al [23] propose to re-compute only those correspondences associated with changed ontology elements. Martins & Silva [24] propose that mapping evolution should behave similarly to strategies applied for ontology evolution.…”

Change management in evolving web ontologies

“…As CHL logs all the changes, these changes can be used to reconcile the mappings between evolved ontologies instead of re-initiating the complete mapping generation process, which is time consuming. For detailed procedure on time efficient reconciliation of mappings between evolving ontologies, please refer to [24,25,29]. Change management and ontology recovery: Change history log records all the changes with time-indexing as per the design pattern in the CHO.…”

“…Reification of time-indexed participation: ChangeSet is a setting for a change event, ontology resources participating in that change event, and the time interval in which the change occurs[24].…”