2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2011.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying artificial optimization methods for transformer model reduction of lumped parameter models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm starts with a population of solutions (usually randomly), then improves it through repetitive process of reproduction, mutation, crossover, inversion, and selection operators. A simple GA procedure can be written as follows [21]. The problem has 50 unknown parameters (21 of which are mutual inductances) and 42 constraints.…”
Section: Optimization Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm starts with a population of solutions (usually randomly), then improves it through repetitive process of reproduction, mutation, crossover, inversion, and selection operators. A simple GA procedure can be written as follows [21]. The problem has 50 unknown parameters (21 of which are mutual inductances) and 42 constraints.…”
Section: Optimization Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the motor performance is simulated by applying the sampled voltages to the model of the motor at the same loading conditions and the corresponding output signals, from the model and the experiments, are compared, while a proper algorithm searches for the static and dynamic eccentricity degrees with the best agreement between the measurement and simulation output signals. Particle swarm optimisation (PSO) is used for searching purposes [28][29][30]. The proposed technique is supported by experimental tests on an 11-kW squirrel-cage induction motor under eccentric and healthy conditions.…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…global best approach, all the particles are mutual neighbours and each particle is influenced by the entire swarm, whereas in the second one, i.e. local best approach, each particle is influenced just by its immediate neighbours [29].…”
Section: Pso Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different stochastic approaches based on measured sweep frequency response such as multiobjective GA, bee colony algorithm, bacterial swarming algorithm (BSA), improved particle swarm optimization, chaos optimization algorithm, genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization, and bacterial foraging are used for solving the APDM problem. In most of the researches, for simplifying the solution of the problem and decreasing the size of the search space, a model with a low number of similar sections is considered and the number of used frequency points is largely reduced . In this paper, it is demonstrated that decreasing the number of used frequency points besides utilizing a model with a low number of sections leads to undesirable errors and an inaccurate model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the researches, for simplifying the solution of the problem and decreasing the size of the search space, a model with a low number of similar sections is considered and the number of used frequency points is largely reduced. 19,[21][22][23][25][26][27] In this paper, it is demonstrated that decreasing the number of used frequency points besides utilizing a model with a low number of sections leads to undesirable errors and an inaccurate model. Therefore, instead of those assumptions, using a fast, powerful, and efficient method is vital for extracting the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%